PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIXD vs. FBND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIXD vs. FBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Smith Opportunistic Fixed Income ETF (FIXD) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIXD achieves a -0.78% return, which is significantly lower than FBND's -0.33% return.


FIXD

1D
-0.16%
1M
-1.41%
6M
-0.99%
YTD
-0.78%
1Y
2.09%
3Y*
3.90%
5Y*
-0.86%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.90%

FBND

1D
-0.27%
1M
-1.26%
6M
-0.60%
YTD
-0.33%
1Y
2.08%
3Y*
4.55%
5Y*
0.31%
10Y*
2.27%
ALL TIME*
2.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$133.84M$127.41M$124.15M
$12.13M$12.35M$17.01M

FIXD vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIXD
First Trust Smith Opportunistic Fixed Income ETF
-0.78%7.95%0.75%5.72%-15.00%-1.07%8.99%10.56%0.00%3.40%
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
-0.33%7.57%2.13%6.81%-12.54%-0.43%9.41%9.82%-0.57%3.41%

Correlation

The correlation between FIXD and FBND is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2017

0.86

The correlation between FIXD and FBND shifts across timeframes, from 0.86 (all time) to 0.97 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIXD vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIXD
FIXD Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FIXD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIXD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIXD Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FIXD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIXD Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

FBND
FBND Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBND Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBND Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIXD vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Smith Opportunistic Fixed Income ETF (FIXD) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIXDFBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.13

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

1.09

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.32

2.77

-0.44

FIXD vs. FBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIXD Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is comparable to the FBND Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIXD and FBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIXD vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIXD drawdown since its inception was -20.44%, which is greater than FBND's maximum drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIXD and FBND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIXDFBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.44%

-17.25%

-3.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.21%

-2.66%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.96%

-4.95%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.44%

-17.25%

-3.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.46%

-2.24%

-2.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.47%

-3.32%

-2.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.26%

1.05%

+0.21%

Volatility

FIXD vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Smith Opportunistic Fixed Income ETF (FIXD) has a higher volatility of 1.09% compared to Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) at 0.95%. This indicates that FIXD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIXDFBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

0.95%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.31%

2.94%

+0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.13%

3.77%

+0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.60%

5.93%

+0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.81%

6.10%

-0.29%

FIXD vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIXD has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIXD vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison

FIXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.80%, which matches FBND's 4.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
4.77%4.70%4.73%4.26%3.07%1.86%4.25%2.90%2.93%2.56%2.84%3.26%
FIXD
First Trust Smith Opportunistic Fixed Income ETF
4.80%4.50%4.56%3.93%3.07%1.74%3.14%5.10%2.81%1.95%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FIXD and FBND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIXD has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to FBND (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIXD dropped -20.44% vs FBND's -17.25%.

On 5-year performance, FBND leads with 0.31% vs -0.86% for FIXD. On fees, FBND is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, FBND has been the lower-risk option at 0.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FBND has performed better with a 0.31% return vs -0.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FBND is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FIXD.

FIXD has the higher dividend yield at 4.80%, compared with 4.77% for FBND.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FIXD and 0.36% for FBND.

FBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIXD and FBND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer