FIX vs. GFI
FIX (Comfort Systems USA, Inc.) and GFI (Gold Fields Limited) are both stocks. FIX operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while GFI operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, FIX returned 50.73%/yr vs 26.67%/yr for GFI. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FIX vs. GFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIX achieves a 98.62% return, which is significantly higher than GFI's -15.43% return. Over the past 10 years, FIX has outperformed GFI with an annualized return of 50.73%, while GFI has yielded a comparatively lower 26.67% annualized return.
FIX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -5.10%
- YTD
- 98.62%
- 6M
- 87.34%
- 1Y
- 263.59%
- 3Y*
- 127.92%
- 5Y*
- 85.83%
- 10Y*
- 50.73%
GFI
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- -20.02%
- YTD
- -15.43%
- 6M
- -10.31%
- 1Y
- 51.45%
- 3Y*
- 36.70%
- 5Y*
- 31.29%
- 10Y*
- 26.67%
FIX vs. GFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIX Comfort Systems USA, Inc. | 98.62% | 120.86% | 106.89% | 79.62% | 16.98% | 88.98% | 6.73% | 15.07% | 0.73% | 32.13% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | -15.43% | 240.42% | -6.27% | 44.90% | -2.61% | 23.33% | 43.02% | 89.47% | -16.75% | 45.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIX and GFI is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2007 | 0.10 |
Over the past year, FIX and GFI have become more correlated (0.31) than their long-term average of 0.10, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
FIX:
$65.29B
GFI:
$32.09B
FIX:
$34.64
GFI:
$5.39
FIX:
53.47
GFI:
6.66
FIX:
0.81
GFI:
0.11
FIX:
6.45
GFI:
2.30
FIX:
23.19
GFI:
3.81
FIX:
$10.14B
GFI:
$13.98B
FIX:
$2.55B
GFI:
$7.34B
FIX:
$1.70B
GFI:
$8.04B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIX vs. GFI — Risk / Return Rank
FIX
GFI
FIX vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIX | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 1.19 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 19.28 | 1.29 | +17.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 59.72 | 3.29 | +56.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIX | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.98 | 0.87 | +4.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.94 | 0.60 | +1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.20 | 0.49 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.12 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
FIX vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIX drawdown since its inception was -93.36%, which is greater than GFI's maximum drawdown of -88.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIX and GFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIX | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.36% | -88.05% | -5.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.77% | -39.97% | +26.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.05% | -39.97% | -6.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.05% | -56.22% | +10.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.68% | -63.09% | +13.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.28% | -39.97% | +30.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.08% | -44.26% | +6.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 15.69% | -11.23% |
Volatility
FIX vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) is 12.60%, while Gold Fields Limited (GFI) has a volatility of 15.34%. This indicates that FIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIX | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.60% | 15.34% | -2.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.27% | 45.82% | -8.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.46% | 59.39% | -5.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.49% | 52.26% | -7.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.35% | 54.86% | -12.51% |
Dividends
FIX vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison
FIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than GFI's 5.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIX Comfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.28% | 0.41% | 0.49% | 0.49% | 0.81% | 0.79% | 0.76% | 0.68% | 0.83% | 0.88% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 5.13% | 1.77% | 2.94% | 2.87% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 1.61% | 1.41% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
Financials
FIX vs. GFI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Comfort Systems USA, Inc. and Gold Fields Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FIX vs. GFI - Profitability Comparison
FIX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported a gross profit of 754.41M and revenue of 2.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.3%.
GFI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.
FIX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported an operating income of 485.72M and revenue of 2.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.0%.
GFI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.
FIX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported a net income of 370.38M and revenue of 2.87B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.
GFI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FIX and GFI have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GFI has higher volatility (15.34%) compared to FIX (12.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIX dropped -93.36% vs GFI's -88.05%.
FIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.98 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIX and GFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer