PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIX vs. COCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FIX vs. COCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) and The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIX achieves a 111.00% return, which is significantly higher than COCO's 58.50% return.


FIX

1D
1.84%
1M
7.61%
YTD
111.00%
6M
109.32%
1Y
294.35%
3Y*
130.85%
5Y*
91.90%
10Y*
51.82%

COCO

1D
0.45%
1M
10.49%
YTD
58.50%
6M
57.11%
1Y
139.24%
3Y*
42.82%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIX vs. COCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FIX
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
111.00%120.86%106.89%79.62%16.98%20.63%
COCO
The Vita Coco Company, Inc.
58.50%43.62%43.90%85.60%23.72%-27.33%

Correlation

The correlation between FIX and COCO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2021

0.24

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FIX:

$69.35B

COCO:

$5.08B

EPS

FIX:

$34.64

COCO:

$1.38

PE Ratio

FIX:

56.80

COCO:

60.89

PEG Ratio

FIX:

0.86

COCO:

0.51

PS Ratio

FIX:

6.86

COCO:

7.67

PB Ratio

FIX:

24.64

COCO:

14.43

Total Revenue (TTM)

FIX:

$10.14B

COCO:

$658.62M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FIX:

$2.55B

COCO:

$246.32M

EBITDA (TTM)

FIX:

$1.70B

COCO:

$100.45M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIX vs. COCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIX
FIX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

COCO
COCO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
COCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
COCO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
COCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
COCO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIX vs. COCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) and The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIXCOCODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.44

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

18.85

5.86

+12.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

63.17

16.41

+46.76

FIX vs. COCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIX Sharpe Ratio is 5.49, which is higher than the COCO Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIX and COCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIX vs. COCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIX drawdown since its inception was -93.36%, which is greater than COCO's maximum drawdown of -56.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIX and COCO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIXCOCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.36%

-56.97%

-36.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.78%

-23.23%

+7.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.05%

-38.55%

-7.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.63%

0.00%

-3.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.04%

-16.76%

-21.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.70%

8.28%

-3.58%

Volatility

FIX vs. COCO - Volatility Comparison

Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) has a higher volatility of 14.03% compared to The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) at 9.69%. This indicates that FIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIXCOCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.03%

9.69%

+4.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.03%

41.61%

-3.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.15%

52.25%

+1.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.64%

56.71%

-12.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.46%

56.71%

-14.25%

Dividends

FIX vs. COCO - Dividend Comparison

FIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while COCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COCO
The Vita Coco Company, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FIX
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
0.13%0.21%0.28%0.41%0.49%0.49%0.81%0.79%0.76%0.68%0.83%0.88%

Financials

FIX vs. COCO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Comfort Systems USA, Inc. and The Vita Coco Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
2.87B
179.77M
(FIX) Total Revenue
(COCO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FIX vs. COCO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Comfort Systems USA, Inc. and The Vita Coco Company, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
26.3%
40.0%
Portfolio components
FIX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported a gross profit of 754.41M and revenue of 2.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.3%.

COCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 71.81M and revenue of 179.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.0%.

FIX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported an operating income of 485.72M and revenue of 2.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.0%.

COCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.58M and revenue of 179.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.7%.

FIX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported a net income of 370.38M and revenue of 2.87B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.

COCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported a net income of 30.47M and revenue of 179.77M, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FIX and COCO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIX has higher volatility (14.03%) compared to COCO (9.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIX dropped -93.36% vs COCO's -56.97%.

FIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.49 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIX and COCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer