PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIWGX vs. IGIB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIWGX vs. IGIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund (FIWGX) and iShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIWGX achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than IGIB's 0.33% return.


FIWGX

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.78%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
0.49%
1Y
3.93%
3Y*
4.20%
5Y*
0.25%
10Y*

IGIB

1D
0.07%
1M
0.63%
YTD
0.33%
6M
0.48%
1Y
5.29%
3Y*
6.29%
5Y*
1.29%
10Y*
3.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIWGX vs. IGIB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIWGX
Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund
-0.05%6.90%2.14%6.51%-13.71%-0.37%10.21%9.39%1.28%
IGIB
iShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
0.33%9.58%3.49%9.22%-14.00%-1.66%9.64%14.60%1.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FIWGX and IGIB is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018

0.85

The correlation between FIWGX and IGIB shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIWGX vs. IGIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIWGX
FIWGX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FIWGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIWGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIWGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FIWGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIWGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

IGIB
IGIB Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
IGIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGIB Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IGIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGIB Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIWGX vs. IGIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund (FIWGX) and iShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIWGXIGIBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.23

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

1.76

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.50

5.67

-0.18

FIWGX vs. IGIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIWGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the IGIB Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIWGX and IGIB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIWGX vs. IGIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIWGX drawdown since its inception was -18.42%, smaller than the maximum IGIB drawdown of -20.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIWGX and IGIB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIWGXIGIBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.42%

-20.62%

+2.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.52%

-3.01%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.24%

-6.05%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.42%

-20.62%

+2.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-1.21%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.00%

-2.58%

-2.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

0.93%

-0.02%

Volatility

FIWGX vs. IGIB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund (FIWGX) is 1.13%, while iShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGIB) has a volatility of 1.22%. This indicates that FIWGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIWGXIGIBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

1.22%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.79%

3.18%

-0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.05%

4.14%

-0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.10%

6.57%

-0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.50%

6.07%

-0.57%

FIWGX vs. IGIB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIWGX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than IGIB's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIWGX vs. IGIB - Dividend Comparison

FIWGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, less than IGIB's 4.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIWGX
Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund
3.44%3.68%4.36%3.79%2.24%1.77%6.83%4.30%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IGIB
iShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.81%4.59%4.41%3.78%3.04%2.52%2.74%3.44%3.41%2.51%2.45%2.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIWGX and IGIB have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGIB has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to FIWGX (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIWGX dropped -18.42% vs IGIB's -20.62%.

IGIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIWGX and IGIB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer