FIWGX vs. FCTDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund (FIWGX) and Strategic Advisers Fidelity U.S. Total Stock Fund (FCTDX).
FIWGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 16, 2018. FCTDX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 20, 2018.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FIWGX or FCTDX.
Key characteristics
FIWGX | FCTDX | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 2.50% | 25.60% |
1Y Return | 8.33% | 33.43% |
3Y Return (Ann) | -1.70% | 8.93% |
5Y Return (Ann) | -0.08% | 15.68% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.30 | 2.68 |
Sortino Ratio | 1.93 | 3.63 |
Omega Ratio | 1.23 | 1.50 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.49 | 3.95 |
Martin Ratio | 4.73 | 17.37 |
Ulcer Index | 1.60% | 1.93% |
Daily Std Dev | 5.87% | 12.49% |
Max Drawdown | -20.11% | -34.51% |
Current Drawdown | -8.92% | -1.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIWGX and FCTDX is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FIWGX vs. FCTDX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FIWGX achieves a 2.50% return, which is significantly lower than FCTDX's 25.60% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIWGX vs. FCTDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIWGX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than FCTDX's 0.61% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FIWGX vs. FCTDX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund (FIWGX) and Strategic Advisers Fidelity U.S. Total Stock Fund (FCTDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FIWGX vs. FCTDX - Dividend Comparison
FIWGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, more than FCTDX's 0.94% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund | 4.18% | 3.80% | 3.01% | 2.02% | 2.50% | 3.01% | 0.55% |
Strategic Advisers Fidelity U.S. Total Stock Fund | 0.94% | 1.05% | 1.22% | 0.80% | 1.33% | 1.50% | 1.15% |
Drawdowns
FIWGX vs. FCTDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIWGX drawdown since its inception was -20.11%, smaller than the maximum FCTDX drawdown of -34.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIWGX and FCTDX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FIWGX vs. FCTDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund (FIWGX) is 1.77%, while Strategic Advisers Fidelity U.S. Total Stock Fund (FCTDX) has a volatility of 3.87%. This indicates that FIWGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCTDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.