PortfoliosLab logo
FIWGX vs. FCTDX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FIWGX and FCTDX is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FIWGX vs. FCTDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund (FIWGX) and Strategic Advisers Fidelity U.S. Total Stock Fund (FCTDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FIWGX:

1.03

FCTDX:

0.23

Sortino Ratio

FIWGX:

1.59

FCTDX:

0.49

Omega Ratio

FIWGX:

1.19

FCTDX:

1.07

Calmar Ratio

FIWGX:

0.47

FCTDX:

0.25

Martin Ratio

FIWGX:

3.02

FCTDX:

0.87

Ulcer Index

FIWGX:

1.97%

FCTDX:

5.70%

Daily Std Dev

FIWGX:

5.53%

FCTDX:

19.32%

Max Drawdown

FIWGX:

-20.11%

FCTDX:

-34.51%

Current Drawdown

FIWGX:

-6.92%

FCTDX:

-8.94%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIWGX achieves a 2.14% return, which is significantly higher than FCTDX's -2.94% return.


FIWGX

YTD

2.14%

1M

0.58%

6M

1.30%

1Y

5.73%

5Y*

-0.25%

10Y*

N/A

FCTDX

YTD

-2.94%

1M

4.53%

6M

-7.35%

1Y

4.44%

5Y*

12.01%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FIWGX vs. FCTDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIWGX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than FCTDX's 0.61% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FIWGX vs. FCTDX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIWGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FIWGX is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FIWGX is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FIWGX is 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FIWGX is 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FIWGX is 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FIWGX is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FCTDX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FCTDX is 3939
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FCTDX is 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FCTDX is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FCTDX is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FCTDX is 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FCTDX is 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FIWGX vs. FCTDX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund (FIWGX) and Strategic Advisers Fidelity U.S. Total Stock Fund (FCTDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FIWGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is higher than the FCTDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIWGX and FCTDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

FIWGX vs. FCTDX - Dividend Comparison

FIWGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, more than FCTDX's 1.20% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
FIWGX
Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund
4.37%4.38%3.80%3.01%2.02%2.50%3.01%0.55%
FCTDX
Strategic Advisers Fidelity U.S. Total Stock Fund
1.20%1.16%1.05%1.22%0.80%1.33%1.50%1.15%

Drawdowns

FIWGX vs. FCTDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIWGX drawdown since its inception was -20.11%, smaller than the maximum FCTDX drawdown of -34.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIWGX and FCTDX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FIWGX vs. FCTDX - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...