PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIWGX vs. FUAMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIWGX vs. FUAMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund (FIWGX) and Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUAMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIWGX achieves a -0.81% return, which is significantly higher than FUAMX's -1.10% return.


FIWGX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.20%
6M
-0.81%
YTD
-0.81%
1Y
2.19%
3Y*
3.91%
5Y*
-0.21%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.49%

FUAMX

1D
0.10%
1M
-1.03%
6M
-0.99%
YTD
-1.10%
1Y
0.87%
3Y*
3.28%
5Y*
-0.99%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FIWGX vs. FUAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIWGX
Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund
-0.81%6.90%2.14%6.51%-13.71%-0.37%10.21%9.39%1.28%
FUAMX
Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund
-1.10%8.00%0.40%4.07%-13.06%-3.19%8.86%7.25%4.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FIWGX and FUAMX is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018

0.89

The correlation between FIWGX and FUAMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.92 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIWGX vs. FUAMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIWGX
FIWGX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FIWGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIWGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIWGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FIWGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIWGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

FUAMX
FUAMX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
FUAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
FUAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIWGX vs. FUAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund (FIWGX) and Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIWGXFUAMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.10

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

0.62

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.14

1.43

+1.71

FIWGX vs. FUAMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIWGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is higher than the FUAMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIWGX and FUAMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIWGX vs. FUAMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIWGX drawdown since its inception was -18.42%, smaller than the maximum FUAMX drawdown of -20.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIWGX and FUAMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIWGXFUAMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.42%

-20.25%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.52%

-3.72%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.20%

-5.83%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.42%

-18.27%

-0.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.98%

-7.47%

+5.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.95%

-7.31%

+2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

1.62%

-0.68%

Volatility

FIWGX vs. FUAMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund (FIWGX) is 0.92%, while Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUAMX) has a volatility of 1.04%. This indicates that FIWGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIWGXFUAMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

1.04%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.78%

3.30%

-0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.93%

4.22%

-0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.11%

6.63%

-0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.47%

5.82%

-0.35%

FIWGX vs. FUAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIWGX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than FUAMX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIWGX vs. FUAMX - Dividend Comparison

FIWGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, less than FUAMX's 3.53% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIWGX
Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund
3.10%3.68%4.36%3.79%2.24%1.77%6.83%4.30%0.57%0.00%
FUAMX
Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund
3.53%3.52%3.58%2.19%1.24%1.76%2.90%2.16%2.23%0.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIWGX and FUAMX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FUAMX has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to FIWGX (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIWGX dropped -18.42% vs FUAMX's -20.25%.

FIWGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIWGX and FUAMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer