FIWGX vs. AMFIX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund (FIWGX) and AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX).

FIWGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 16, 2018. AMFIX is managed by AAMA. It was launched on Jun 30, 2017.

Performance

FIWGX vs. AMFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund (FIWGX) and AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FIWGX vs. AMFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FIWGX Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund	-0.76%	6.90%	2.14%	6.51%	-13.71%	-0.37%	10.21%	9.39%	1.28%
AMFIX AAMA Income Fund	0.25%	3.74%	3.48%	3.84%	-6.26%	-1.37%	2.24%	2.47%	0.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIWGX achieves a -0.76% return, which is significantly lower than AMFIX's 0.25% return.

FIWGX

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -1.61%
• YTD: -0.76%
• 6M: -0.28%
• 1Y: 2.78%
• 3Y*: 3.79%
• 5Y*: 0.39%
• 10Y*: —

AMFIX

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -0.28%
• YTD: 0.25%
• 6M: 1.01%
• 1Y: 2.97%
• 3Y*: 3.24%
• 5Y*: 0.73%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIWGX vs. AMFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIWGX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than AMFIX's 0.92% expense ratio.

AMFIX

AAMA Income Fund

FIWGX

Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund

Return for Risk

FIWGX vs. AMFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIWGX

FIWGX Risk / Return Rank: 36
FIWGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
FIWGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
FIWGX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
FIWGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
FIWGX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

AMFIX

AMFIX Risk / Return Rank: 98
AMFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
AMFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
AMFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
AMFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
AMFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIWGX vs. AMFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund (FIWGX) and AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FIWGX	AMFIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.77	3.10	-2.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.09	5.02	-3.93
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.70	-0.57
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	4.08	-2.67
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.49	20.23	-15.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FIWGX vs. AMFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIWGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the AMFIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIWGX and AMFIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIWGX	AMFIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77	3.10	-2.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07	0.34	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.57	-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between FIWGX and AMFIX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FIWGX vs. AMFIX - Dividend Comparison

FIWGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than AMFIX's 2.22% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FIWGX Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund	2.75%	3.68%	4.36%	3.79%	2.24%	1.77%	6.83%	4.30%	0.57%	0.00%
AMFIX AAMA Income Fund	2.22%	2.08%	2.44%	1.70%	0.83%	0.57%	0.83%	1.24%	1.24%	0.40%

Drawdowns

FIWGX vs. AMFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIWGX drawdown since its inception was -18.42%, which is greater than AMFIX's maximum drawdown of -9.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIWGX and AMFIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIWGX	AMFIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.42%	-9.35%	-9.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.25%	-0.74%	-2.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.42%	-8.91%	-9.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.92%	-0.45%	-1.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.10%	-2.06%	-3.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.02%	0.15%	+0.87%

Volatility

FIWGX vs. AMFIX - Volatility Comparison

Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund (FIWGX) has a higher volatility of 1.31% compared to AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX) at 0.46%. This indicates that FIWGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIWGX	AMFIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.31%	0.46%	+0.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.74%	0.72%	+2.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.92%	0.98%	+3.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.06%	2.16%	+3.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.53%	1.75%	+3.78%