PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIVA vs. UIVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIVA vs. UIVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIVA achieves a 12.92% return, which is significantly lower than UIVM's 14.89% return.


FIVA

1D
-0.36%
1M
5.48%
YTD
12.92%
6M
18.20%
1Y
35.97%
3Y*
22.76%
5Y*
12.50%
10Y*

UIVM

1D
-0.94%
1M
4.60%
YTD
14.89%
6M
18.61%
1Y
34.29%
3Y*
24.74%
5Y*
11.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIVA vs. UIVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIVA
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF
12.92%45.83%2.53%20.38%-10.37%15.90%-1.78%19.78%-19.20%
UIVM
VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF
14.89%45.47%5.23%16.79%-13.31%11.85%0.76%15.29%-21.88%

Correlation

The correlation between FIVA and UIVM is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2018

0.91

The correlation between FIVA and UIVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

FIVA vs. UIVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FIVA
UIVM

Financial Services

25.5%
30.3%

Industrials

19.3%
21.4%

Technology

11.4%
5.7%

Healthcare

8.6%
5.7%

Basic Materials

7.8%
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%
8.3%

Energy

6.1%
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
6.1%

Utilities

3.9%
4.9%

Communication Services

3.2%
3.1%

Real Estate

1.8%
4.7%

Financial Services

FIVA
25.5%
UIVM
30.3%

Industrials

FIVA
19.3%
UIVM
21.4%

Technology

FIVA
11.4%
UIVM
5.7%

Healthcare

FIVA
8.6%
UIVM
5.7%

Basic Materials

FIVA
7.8%
UIVM
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FIVA
6.8%
UIVM
8.3%

Energy

FIVA
6.1%
UIVM
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

FIVA
5.6%
UIVM
6.1%

Utilities

FIVA
3.9%
UIVM
4.9%

Communication Services

FIVA
3.2%
UIVM
3.1%

Real Estate

FIVA
1.8%
UIVM
4.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIVA vs. UIVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIVA
FIVA Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FIVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIVA Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FIVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIVA Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

UIVM
UIVM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
UIVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UIVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
UIVM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
UIVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
UIVM Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIVA vs. UIVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIVAUIVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.43

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

3.13

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.07

11.47

+0.60

FIVA vs. UIVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIVA Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the UIVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIVA and UIVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIVAUIVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

2.37

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.77

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.47

+0.01

Drawdowns

FIVA vs. UIVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIVA drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, smaller than the maximum UIVM drawdown of -42.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVA and UIVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIVAUIVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.76%

-42.73%

+2.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.71%

-11.02%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.77%

-11.69%

-3.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.70%

-28.27%

-0.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-0.94%

+0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.78%

-9.71%

+1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

3.00%

-0.01%

Volatility

FIVA vs. UIVM - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) have volatilities of 5.02% and 5.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIVAUIVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.02%

5.17%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.40%

12.46%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.18%

14.56%

+0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.33%

15.45%

+0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.90%

17.21%

+0.69%

FIVA vs. UIVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIVA has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than UIVM's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIVA vs. UIVM - Dividend Comparison

FIVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than UIVM's 3.22% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIVA
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF
2.52%2.68%3.52%3.63%3.62%3.76%2.46%3.61%3.28%0.00%
UIVM
VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF
3.22%3.70%5.09%4.35%3.03%3.48%1.63%3.49%2.78%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FIVA and UIVM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

UIVM has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to FIVA (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVA dropped -39.76% vs UIVM's -42.73%.

On 5-year performance, FIVA leads with 12.50% vs 11.85% for UIVM. On fees, UIVM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FIVA has been the lower-risk option at 5.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FIVA has performed better with a 12.50% return vs 11.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UIVM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FIVA.

UIVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 2.52% for FIVA.

FIVA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while UIVM is Momentum. FIVA tracks Fidelity® International Value Factor Index, while UIVM tracks Nasdaq Victory International Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FIVA and 0.35% for UIVM.

FIVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIVA and UIVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer