FIVA vs. IFLO

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

FIVA (Fidelity International Value Factor ETF) and IFLO (VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past year, FIVA returned 35.88% vs 31.49% for IFLO. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FIVA charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for IFLO.

Performance

FIVA vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIVA achieves a 15.61% return, which is significantly lower than IFLO's 18.83% return.

FIVA

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 0.47%
• 6M: 12.13%
• YTD: 15.61%
• 1Y: 35.88%
• 3Y*: 21.63%
• 5Y*: 13.91%
• 10Y*: —

IFLO

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: -0.45%
• 6M: 15.93%
• YTD: 18.83%
• 1Y: 31.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIVA vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF	15.61%	20.57%
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF	18.83%	13.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FIVA and IFLO is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.88

The correlation between FIVA and IFLO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

FIVA vs. IFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FIVA	IFLO
Financial Services	27.9%	1.1%
Industrials	16.6%	18.1%
Technology	15.7%	21.5%
Healthcare	8.2%	11.7%
Consumer Cyclical	7.5%	13.8%
Basic Materials	7.0%	11.3%
Consumer Defensive	5.3%	2.8%
Energy	4.7%	12.1%
Communication Services	2.8%	6.7%
Utilities	2.7%	1.0%
Real Estate	1.6%	0.0%

Return for Risk

FIVA vs. IFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIVA

FIVA Risk / Return Rank: 82
FIVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FIVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FIVA Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FIVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
FIVA Martin Ratio Rank: 79

IFLO

IFLO Risk / Return Rank: 88
IFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
IFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
IFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
IFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
IFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIVA vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIVA	IFLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.25	2.16	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	3.13	-0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.39	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	4.91	-1.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.01	16.57	-4.56

FIVA vs. IFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIVA Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the IFLO Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIVA and IFLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FIVA vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIVA drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVA and IFLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIVA	IFLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.76%	-6.44%	-33.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.71%	-6.44%	-5.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.28%	-1.80%	+1.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.69%	-1.29%	-6.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.00%	1.92%	+1.08%

Volatility

FIVA vs. IFLO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO) at 3.54%. This indicates that FIVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIVA	IFLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.37%	3.54%	+0.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.66%	12.03%	+1.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.03%	14.68%	+1.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.44%	14.58%	+1.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.92%	14.58%	+3.34%

FIVA vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIVA has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIVA vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison

FIVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than IFLO's 1.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF	2.61%	2.68%	3.52%	3.63%	3.62%	3.76%	2.46%	3.61%	3.28%
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF	1.57%	0.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIVA and IFLO in my portfolio?

FIVA and IFLO have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIVA or IFLO?

FIVA has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to IFLO (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVA dropped -39.76% vs IFLO's -6.44%.

Which ETF is better, FIVA or IFLO?

On 1-year performance, FIVA leads with 35.88% vs 31.49% for IFLO. On fees, FIVA is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IFLO has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FIVA or IFLO?

Over the 1-year period, FIVA has performed better with a 35.88% return vs 31.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FIVA or IFLO?

FIVA is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IFLO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FIVA or IFLO?

FIVA has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 1.57% for IFLO.

What is the main difference between FIVA and IFLO?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FIVA and 0.56% for IFLO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FIVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.