PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIVA vs. IDMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIVA vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIVA achieves a 13.25% return, which is significantly higher than IDMO's 9.69% return.


FIVA

1D
-2.31%
1M
1.70%
YTD
13.25%
6M
13.22%
1Y
37.08%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
13.11%
10Y*

IDMO

1D
-2.67%
1M
1.51%
YTD
9.69%
6M
8.93%
1Y
26.34%
3Y*
26.46%
5Y*
15.55%
10Y*
13.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIVA vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIVA
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF
13.25%45.83%2.53%20.38%-10.37%15.90%-1.78%19.78%-18.62%
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
9.69%42.17%12.79%20.16%-12.03%14.31%22.01%26.09%-20.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FIVA and IDMO is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2018

0.76

The correlation between FIVA and IDMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.87 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FIVA vs. IDMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FIVA
IDMO

Financial Services

27.4%
43.2%

Industrials

16.5%
21.3%

Technology

15.2%
6.2%

Healthcare

8.0%
1.1%

Basic Materials

7.7%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
2.5%

Energy

4.9%
1.7%

Utilities

3.3%
7.9%

Communication Services

3.0%
2.1%

Real Estate

1.5%
1.8%

Financial Services

FIVA
27.4%
IDMO
43.2%

Industrials

FIVA
16.5%
IDMO
21.3%

Technology

FIVA
15.2%
IDMO
6.2%

Healthcare

FIVA
8.0%
IDMO
1.1%

Basic Materials

FIVA
7.7%
IDMO
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FIVA
6.6%
IDMO
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

FIVA
5.2%
IDMO
2.5%

Energy

FIVA
4.9%
IDMO
1.7%

Utilities

FIVA
3.3%
IDMO
7.9%

Communication Services

FIVA
3.0%
IDMO
2.1%

Real Estate

FIVA
1.5%
IDMO
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIVA vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIVA
FIVA Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FIVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIVA Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FIVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIVA Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

IDMO
IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIVA vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIVAIDMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.27

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

2.15

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.44

8.70

+3.73

FIVA vs. IDMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIVA Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the IDMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIVA and IDMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIVA vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIVA drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, roughly equal to the maximum IDMO drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVA and IDMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIVAIDMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.76%

-39.38%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.71%

-12.31%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.77%

-12.65%

-2.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.70%

-27.07%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.31%

-2.67%

+0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.73%

-9.73%

+2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

3.03%

-0.04%

Volatility

FIVA vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) is 6.05%, while Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) has a volatility of 7.84%. This indicates that FIVA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIVAIDMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.05%

7.84%

-1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.46%

16.34%

-2.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.95%

18.13%

-2.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.45%

18.09%

-1.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.95%

17.95%

0.00%

FIVA vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIVA has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IDMO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FIVA vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison

FIVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, less than IDMO's 3.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIVA
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF
2.66%2.68%3.52%3.63%3.62%3.76%2.46%3.61%3.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
3.64%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIVA and IDMO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDMO has higher volatility (7.84%) compared to FIVA (6.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVA dropped -39.76% vs IDMO's -39.38%.

On 5-year performance, IDMO leads with 15.55% vs 13.11% for FIVA. On fees, FIVA is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FIVA has been the lower-risk option at 6.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 15.55% return vs 13.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FIVA is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IDMO.

IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.64%, compared with 2.66% for FIVA.

FIVA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IDMO is Momentum. FIVA tracks Fidelity International Value Factor Index, while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FIVA and 0.25% for IDMO.

FIVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIVA and IDMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer