FIVA vs. IDEV
FIVA (Fidelity International Value Factor ETF) and IDEV (iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - FIVA tracks the Fidelity® International Value Factor Index while IDEV tracks the MSCI World ex USA Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FIVA returned 12.50%/yr vs 8.48%/yr for IDEV. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FIVA charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for IDEV.
Performance
FIVA vs. IDEV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIVA achieves a 12.92% return, which is significantly higher than IDEV's 8.92% return.
FIVA
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 5.48%
- YTD
- 12.92%
- 6M
- 18.20%
- 1Y
- 35.97%
- 3Y*
- 22.76%
- 5Y*
- 12.50%
- 10Y*
- —
IDEV
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 3.23%
- YTD
- 8.92%
- 6M
- 11.57%
- 1Y
- 23.20%
- 3Y*
- 17.40%
- 5Y*
- 8.48%
- 10Y*
- —
FIVA vs. IDEV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF | 12.92% | 45.83% | 2.53% | 20.38% | -10.37% | 15.90% | -1.78% | 19.78% | -19.20% |
IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | 8.92% | 32.56% | 4.54% | 17.36% | -14.99% | 13.00% | 8.32% | 23.12% | -17.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIVA and IDEV is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2018 | 0.92 |
The correlation between FIVA and IDEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
FIVA vs. IDEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FIVA
IDEV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
FIVA
IDEV
Industrials
FIVA
IDEV
Technology
FIVA
IDEV
Healthcare
FIVA
IDEV
Basic Materials
FIVA
IDEV
Consumer Cyclical
FIVA
IDEV
Energy
FIVA
IDEV
Consumer Defensive
FIVA
IDEV
Utilities
FIVA
IDEV
Communication Services
FIVA
IDEV
Real Estate
FIVA
IDEV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIVA vs. IDEV — Risk / Return Rank
FIVA
IDEV
FIVA vs. IDEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIVA | IDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.39 | 1.61 | +0.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.31 | 2.29 | +1.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.29 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 2.08 | +1.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.07 | 8.16 | +3.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIVA | IDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 1.61 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.52 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.55 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
FIVA vs. IDEV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIVA drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, which is greater than IDEV's maximum drawdown of -34.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVA and IDEV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIVA | IDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.76% | -34.77% | -4.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.71% | -11.20% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.77% | -13.41% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.70% | -29.15% | +0.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -0.98% | +0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.78% | -6.57% | -1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 2.85% | +0.14% |
Volatility
FIVA vs. IDEV - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) has a higher volatility of 5.02% compared to iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) at 4.60%. This indicates that FIVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIVA | IDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.02% | 4.60% | +0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.40% | 12.10% | +0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.18% | 14.51% | +0.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 16.26% | +0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.90% | 17.27% | +0.63% |
FIVA vs. IDEV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIVA has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IDEV's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIVA vs. IDEV - Dividend Comparison
FIVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than IDEV's 3.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF | 2.52% | 2.68% | 3.52% | 3.63% | 3.62% | 3.76% | 2.46% | 3.61% | 3.28% | 0.00% |
IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | 3.13% | 3.40% | 3.30% | 3.07% | 2.69% | 3.05% | 2.00% | 3.18% | 3.16% | 1.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, FIVA and IDEV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FIVA has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to IDEV (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVA dropped -39.76% vs IDEV's -34.77%.
On 5-year performance, FIVA leads with 12.50% vs 8.48% for IDEV. On fees, IDEV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IDEV has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FIVA has performed better with a 12.50% return vs 8.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDEV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FIVA.
IDEV has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 2.52% for FIVA.
FIVA tracks Fidelity® International Value Factor Index, while IDEV tracks MSCI World ex USA Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FIVA and 0.05% for IDEV.
FIVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIVA and IDEV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer