PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIVA vs. FIWCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIVA vs. FIWCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and Fidelity SAI International Value Index Fund (FIWCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FIVA having a 18.57% return and FIWCX slightly higher at 19.38%.


FIVA

1D
0.87%
1M
3.50%
6M
9.84%
YTD
18.57%
1Y
39.55%
3Y*
23.13%
5Y*
14.16%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.21%

FIWCX

1D
0.54%
1M
4.37%
6M
10.76%
YTD
19.38%
1Y
37.28%
3Y*
23.46%
5Y*
14.73%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.16M$3.09M$3.15M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FIVA vs. FIWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIVA
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF
18.57%45.83%2.53%20.38%-10.37%15.90%-1.78%19.78%-18.62%
FIWCX
Fidelity SAI International Value Index Fund
19.38%43.38%4.94%18.99%-5.96%13.88%-3.94%17.30%-20.55%

Correlation

The correlation between FIVA and FIWCX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2018

0.92

The correlation between FIVA and FIWCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIVA vs. FIWCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIVA
FIVA Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FIVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIVA Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FIVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIVA Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

FIWCX
FIWCX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FIWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FIWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIVA vs. FIWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and Fidelity SAI International Value Index Fund (FIWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIVAFIWCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.46

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

3.53

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.44

13.84

-0.39

FIVA vs. FIWCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIVA Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the FIWCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIVA and FIWCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIVA vs. FIWCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIVA drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, smaller than the maximum FIWCX drawdown of -42.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVA and FIWCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIVAFIWCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.76%

-42.73%

+2.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.71%

-11.13%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.77%

-14.83%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.70%

-28.49%

-0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.53%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.64%

-8.92%

+1.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

2.83%

+0.12%

Volatility

FIVA vs. FIWCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to Fidelity SAI International Value Index Fund (FIWCX) at 4.14%. This indicates that FIVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIWCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIVAFIWCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

4.14%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.77%

12.59%

+1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.00%

15.01%

+0.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.46%

16.21%

+0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.91%

18.18%

-0.27%

FIVA vs. FIWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIVA has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FIWCX's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FIVA vs. FIWCX - Dividend Comparison

FIVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than FIWCX's 5.84% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIVA
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF
2.54%2.68%3.52%3.63%3.62%3.76%2.46%3.61%3.28%0.00%
FIWCX
Fidelity SAI International Value Index Fund
5.84%6.97%4.26%5.88%4.66%8.74%1.58%3.40%2.18%0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FIVA and FIWCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIVA has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to FIWCX (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVA dropped -39.76% vs FIWCX's -42.73%.

FIWCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIVA and FIWCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer