FIVA vs. FIWCX
FIVA (Fidelity International Value Factor ETF) and FIWCX (Fidelity SAI International Value Index Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FIVA returned 14.16%/yr vs 14.73%/yr for FIWCX. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FIVA charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for FIWCX.
Performance
FIVA vs. FIWCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FIVA having a 18.57% return and FIWCX slightly higher at 19.38%.
FIVA
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 3.50%
- 6M
- 9.84%
- YTD
- 18.57%
- 1Y
- 39.55%
- 3Y*
- 23.13%
- 5Y*
- 14.16%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.21%
FIWCX
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 4.37%
- 6M
- 10.76%
- YTD
- 19.38%
- 1Y
- 37.28%
- 3Y*
- 23.46%
- 5Y*
- 14.73%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.46%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.16M | $3.09M | $3.15M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FIVA vs. FIWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF | 18.57% | 45.83% | 2.53% | 20.38% | -10.37% | 15.90% | -1.78% | 19.78% | -18.62% |
FIWCX Fidelity SAI International Value Index Fund | 19.38% | 43.38% | 4.94% | 18.99% | -5.96% | 13.88% | -3.94% | 17.30% | -20.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIVA and FIWCX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2018 | 0.92 |
The correlation between FIVA and FIWCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIVA vs. FIWCX — Risk / Return Rank
FIVA
FIWCX
FIVA vs. FIWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and Fidelity SAI International Value Index Fund (FIWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIVA | FIWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.46 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 3.53 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.44 | 13.84 | -0.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIVA vs. FIWCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIVA drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, smaller than the maximum FIWCX drawdown of -42.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVA and FIWCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIVA | FIWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.76% | -42.73% | +2.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.71% | -11.13% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.77% | -14.83% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.70% | -28.49% | -0.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.53% | +0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.64% | -8.92% | +1.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 2.83% | +0.12% |
Volatility
FIVA vs. FIWCX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to Fidelity SAI International Value Index Fund (FIWCX) at 4.14%. This indicates that FIVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIWCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIVA | FIWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | 4.14% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.77% | 12.59% | +1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.00% | 15.01% | +0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.46% | 16.21% | +0.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.91% | 18.18% | -0.27% |
FIVA vs. FIWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIVA has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FIWCX's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FIVA vs. FIWCX - Dividend Comparison
FIVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than FIWCX's 5.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF | 2.54% | 2.68% | 3.52% | 3.63% | 3.62% | 3.76% | 2.46% | 3.61% | 3.28% | 0.00% |
FIWCX Fidelity SAI International Value Index Fund | 5.84% | 6.97% | 4.26% | 5.88% | 4.66% | 8.74% | 1.58% | 3.40% | 2.18% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, FIVA and FIWCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FIVA has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to FIWCX (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVA dropped -39.76% vs FIWCX's -42.73%.
FIWCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIVA and FIWCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer