PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIWCX vs. SFNNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIWCX vs. SFNNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity SAI International Value Index Fund (FIWCX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIWCX achieves a 13.82% return, which is significantly lower than SFNNX's 21.09% return.


FIWCX

1D
-0.49%
1M
3.32%
YTD
13.82%
6M
18.28%
1Y
33.63%
3Y*
23.60%
5Y*
13.03%
10Y*

SFNNX

1D
0.96%
1M
6.32%
YTD
21.09%
6M
25.51%
1Y
43.99%
3Y*
24.21%
5Y*
13.37%
10Y*
11.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIWCX vs. SFNNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIWCX
Fidelity SAI International Value Index Fund
13.82%43.38%4.94%18.99%-5.96%13.88%-3.94%17.30%-16.13%0.77%
SFNNX
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund
21.09%41.06%2.27%19.88%-7.95%14.38%4.35%18.09%-13.96%1.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FIWCX and SFNNX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2017

0.95

The correlation between FIWCX and SFNNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIWCX vs. SFNNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIWCX
FIWCX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FIWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FIWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

SFNNX
SFNNX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SFNNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFNNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFNNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SFNNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFNNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIWCX vs. SFNNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI International Value Index Fund (FIWCX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIWCXSFNNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.40

3.19

-0.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.28

4.09

-0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.57

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

4.31

-1.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.52

16.20

-3.68

FIWCX vs. SFNNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIWCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the SFNNX Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIWCX and SFNNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIWCXSFNNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

3.19

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.86

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.28

+0.22

Drawdowns

FIWCX vs. SFNNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIWCX drawdown since its inception was -42.73%, smaller than the maximum SFNNX drawdown of -59.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIWCX and SFNNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIWCXSFNNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.73%

-59.60%

+16.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.13%

-10.63%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.83%

-13.78%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.49%

-25.66%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

0.00%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.09%

-11.97%

+2.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

2.82%

+0.04%

Volatility

FIWCX vs. SFNNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity SAI International Value Index Fund (FIWCX) is 4.36%, while Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX) has a volatility of 4.69%. This indicates that FIWCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFNNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIWCXSFNNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

4.69%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.49%

11.58%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.68%

14.39%

+0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.16%

15.56%

+0.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.22%

17.29%

+0.93%

FIWCX vs. SFNNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIWCX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than SFNNX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FIWCX vs. SFNNX - Dividend Comparison

FIWCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.13%, more than SFNNX's 4.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIWCX
Fidelity SAI International Value Index Fund
6.13%6.97%4.26%5.88%4.66%8.74%1.58%3.40%2.18%0.07%0.00%0.00%
SFNNX
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund
4.22%5.11%3.61%3.26%2.92%3.81%2.42%3.69%3.51%2.70%3.21%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FIWCX and SFNNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SFNNX has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to FIWCX (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIWCX dropped -42.73% vs SFNNX's -59.60%.

SFNNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIWCX and SFNNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer