FIVA vs. FBTC

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FIVA (Fidelity International Value Factor ETF) and FBTC (Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FIVA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Fidelity International Value Factor Index, while FBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FIVA returned 35.11% vs -43.57% for FBTC. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FIVA charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FBTC.

Performance

FIVA vs. FBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIVA achieves a 12.72% return, which is significantly higher than FBTC's -31.72% return.

FIVA

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 1.22%
• YTD: 12.72%
• 6M: 12.59%
• 1Y: 35.11%
• 3Y*: 22.53%
• 5Y*: 12.96%
• 10Y*: —

FBTC

• 1D: -4.06%
• 1M: -21.11%
• YTD: -31.72%
• 6M: -31.53%
• 1Y: -43.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIVA vs. FBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF	12.72%	45.83%	3.10%
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	-31.72%	-6.56%	94.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FIVA and FBTC is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.31

Return for Risk

FIVA vs. FBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIVA

FIVA Risk / Return Rank: 73
FIVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
FIVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
FIVA Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FIVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
FIVA Martin Ratio Rank: 71

FBTC

FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 2
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIVA vs. FBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIVA	FBTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	-0.99	+3.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	-1.45	+4.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	0.84	+0.55
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.01	-0.83	+3.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.75	-1.42	+13.17

FIVA vs. FBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIVA Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the FBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIVA and FBTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FIVA vs. FBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIVA drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, smaller than the maximum FBTC drawdown of -52.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVA and FBTC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIVA	FBTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.76%	-52.44%	+12.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.71%	-52.44%	+40.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.77%	-52.44%	+49.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.73%	-16.83%	+9.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.99%	30.72%	-27.73%

Volatility

FIVA vs. FBTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) is 6.06%, while Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) has a volatility of 13.34%. This indicates that FIVA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIVA	FBTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.06%	13.34%	-7.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.46%	34.52%	-21.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.95%	44.35%	-28.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.44%	50.11%	-33.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.94%	50.11%	-32.17%

FIVA vs. FBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIVA has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FBTC's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FIVA vs. FBTC - Dividend Comparison

FIVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, while FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF	2.68%	2.68%	3.52%	3.63%	3.62%	3.76%	2.46%	3.61%	3.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIVA and FBTC in my portfolio?

FIVA and FBTC have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIVA or FBTC?

FBTC has higher volatility (13.34%) compared to FIVA (6.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVA dropped -39.76% vs FBTC's -52.44%.

Which ETF is better, FIVA or FBTC?

On 1-year performance, FIVA leads with 35.11% vs -43.57% for FBTC. On fees, FIVA is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FIVA has been the lower-risk option at 6.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FIVA or FBTC?

Over the 1-year period, FIVA has performed better with a 35.11% return vs -43.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FIVA or FBTC?

FIVA is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FBTC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FIVA or FBTC?

FIVA has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 0.00% for FBTC.

What is the main difference between FIVA and FBTC?

FIVA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FBTC is Cryptocurrency. FIVA tracks Fidelity International Value Factor Index, while FBTC tracks Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FIVA and 0.25% for FBTC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FIVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.