FIVA vs. CIL

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

FIVA (Fidelity International Value Factor ETF) and CIL (VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - FIVA tracks the Fidelity International Value Factor Index while CIL tracks the Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FIVA returned 14.16%/yr vs 7.07%/yr for CIL. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FIVA charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CIL.

Performance

FIVA vs. CIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIVA achieves a 18.57% return, which is significantly higher than CIL's 5.44% return.

FIVA

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: 3.50%
• 6M: 9.84%
• YTD: 18.57%
• 1Y: 39.55%
• 3Y*: 23.13%
• 5Y*: 14.16%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.21%

CIL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.44%
• 1Y: 14.95%
• 3Y*: 15.35%
• 5Y*: 7.07%
• 10Y*: 8.18%
• ALL TIME*: 7.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF	$3.16M	$3.09M	$3.15M

FIVA vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF	18.57%	45.83%	2.53%	20.38%	-10.37%	15.90%	-1.78%	19.78%	-18.62%
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	5.44%	32.99%	3.76%	16.29%	-16.00%	11.07%	7.21%	19.13%	-17.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FIVA and CIL is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2018	0.74

The correlation between FIVA and CIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.81 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FIVA vs. CIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FIVA	CIL
Financial Services	26.1%	24.8%
Industrials	17.9%	18.4%
Technology	15.8%	6.4%
Healthcare	8.3%	7.7%
Basic Materials	7.1%	6.6%
Consumer Cyclical	6.9%	8.2%
Consumer Defensive	5.4%	8.8%
Energy	4.8%	4.6%
Utilities	3.4%	6.6%
Communication Services	2.8%	5.8%
Real Estate	1.6%	2.2%

Return for Risk

FIVA vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIVA

FIVA Risk / Return Rank: 88
FIVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FIVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
FIVA Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FIVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
FIVA Martin Ratio Rank: 86

CIL

CIL Risk / Return Rank: 90
CIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
CIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
CIL Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
CIL Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIVA vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIVA	CIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	2.34	+0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	3.53	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.62	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.39	3.40	0.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.44	16.94	-3.50

FIVA vs. CIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIVA Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the CIL Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIVA and CIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FIVA vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIVA drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, which is greater than CIL's maximum drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVA and CIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIVA	CIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.76%	-36.27%	-3.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.71%	-4.60%	-7.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.77%	-11.29%	-3.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.70%	-29.89%	+1.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.58%	+0.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.64%	-6.46%	-1.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.95%	1.04%	+1.91%

Volatility

FIVA vs. CIL - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) at 0.00%. This indicates that FIVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIVA	CIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.36%	0.00%	+4.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.77%	2.10%	+11.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.00%	6.75%	+9.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.46%	16.39%	+0.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.91%	16.74%	+1.17%

FIVA vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIVA has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CIL's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIVA vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison

FIVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than CIL's 1.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	1.05%	2.70%	3.46%	2.91%	2.41%	3.04%	1.73%	2.69%	2.85%	2.17%	2.34%	0.43%
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF	2.54%	2.68%	3.52%	3.63%	3.62%	3.76%	2.46%	3.61%	3.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIVA and CIL in my portfolio?

FIVA and CIL have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIVA or CIL?

FIVA has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to CIL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVA dropped -39.76% vs CIL's -36.27%.

Which ETF is better, FIVA or CIL?

On 5-year performance, FIVA leads with 14.16% vs 7.07% for CIL. On fees, FIVA is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, CIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FIVA or CIL?

Over the 5-year period, FIVA has performed better with a 14.16% return vs 7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FIVA or CIL?

FIVA is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CIL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FIVA or CIL?

FIVA has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 1.05% for CIL.

What is the main difference between FIVA and CIL?

FIVA tracks Fidelity International Value Factor Index, while CIL tracks Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FIVA and 0.45% for CIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FIVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.