PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIVA vs. BKIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIVA vs. BKIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIVA achieves a 18.57% return, which is significantly higher than BKIE's 13.51% return.


FIVA

1D
0.87%
1M
3.50%
6M
9.84%
YTD
18.57%
1Y
39.55%
3Y*
23.13%
5Y*
14.16%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.21%

BKIE

1D
1.22%
1M
2.91%
6M
7.75%
YTD
13.51%
1Y
26.45%
3Y*
18.64%
5Y*
10.01%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.38M$6.81M$5.78M
$3.16M$3.09M$3.15M

FIVA vs. BKIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FIVA
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF
18.57%45.83%2.53%20.38%-10.37%15.90%34.05%
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
13.51%32.08%4.63%18.25%-13.60%13.75%34.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FIVA and BKIE is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020

0.94

The correlation between FIVA and BKIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

FIVA vs. BKIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FIVA
BKIE

Financial Services

26.1%
26.6%

Industrials

17.9%
17.9%

Technology

15.8%
11.7%

Healthcare

8.3%
9.1%

Basic Materials

7.1%
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
6.3%

Energy

4.8%
5.0%

Utilities

3.4%
3.5%

Communication Services

2.8%
4.1%

Real Estate

1.6%
1.8%

Financial Services

FIVA
26.1%
BKIE
26.6%

Industrials

FIVA
17.9%
BKIE
17.9%

Technology

FIVA
15.8%
BKIE
11.7%

Healthcare

FIVA
8.3%
BKIE
9.1%

Basic Materials

FIVA
7.1%
BKIE
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FIVA
6.9%
BKIE
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

FIVA
5.4%
BKIE
6.3%

Energy

FIVA
4.8%
BKIE
5.0%

Utilities

FIVA
3.4%
BKIE
3.5%

Communication Services

FIVA
2.8%
BKIE
4.1%

Real Estate

FIVA
1.6%
BKIE
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIVA vs. BKIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIVA
FIVA Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FIVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIVA Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FIVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIVA Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

BKIE
BKIE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BKIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKIE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
BKIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKIE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIVA vs. BKIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIVABKIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.31

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

2.33

+1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.44

9.05

+4.40

FIVA vs. BKIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIVA Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the BKIE Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIVA and BKIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIVA vs. BKIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIVA drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, which is greater than BKIE's maximum drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVA and BKIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIVABKIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.76%

-28.19%

-11.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.71%

-11.41%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.77%

-13.19%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.70%

-28.19%

-0.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.64%

-4.87%

-2.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

2.93%

+0.02%

Volatility

FIVA vs. BKIE - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) have volatilities of 4.36% and 4.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIVABKIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

4.18%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.77%

13.02%

+0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.00%

15.25%

+0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.46%

16.22%

+0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.91%

16.32%

+1.59%

FIVA vs. BKIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIVA has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than BKIE's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FIVA vs. BKIE - Dividend Comparison

FIVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than BKIE's 3.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
3.10%3.12%3.31%2.88%2.97%2.58%1.49%0.00%0.00%
FIVA
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF
2.54%2.68%3.52%3.63%3.62%3.76%2.46%3.61%3.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FIVA and BKIE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIVA has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to BKIE (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVA dropped -39.76% vs BKIE's -28.19%.

On 5-year performance, FIVA leads with 14.16% vs 10.01% for BKIE. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKIE has been the lower-risk option at 4.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FIVA has performed better with a 14.16% return vs 10.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for FIVA.

BKIE has the higher dividend yield at 3.10%, compared with 2.54% for FIVA.

FIVA tracks Fidelity International Value Factor Index, while BKIE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex United States Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FIVA and 0.04% for BKIE.

FIVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIVA and BKIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer