FITE vs. ARMH
FITE (SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. FITE is passively managed, while ARMH is actively managed. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FITE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.
Performance
FITE vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FITE
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- -5.38%
- 6M
- 15.88%
- YTD
- 25.01%
- 1Y
- 42.30%
- 3Y*
- 29.02%
- 5Y*
- 15.64%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.58%
ARMH
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -23.97%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $194.56K | $502.72K | $705.34K | |
| $864.27K | $865.45K | $935.71K |
FITE vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FITE SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF | -4.46% |
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | -22.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between FITE and ARMH is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FITE vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank
FITE
ARMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FITE vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF (FITE) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FITE | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.33 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FITE vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FITE drawdown since its inception was -36.90%, smaller than the maximum ARMH drawdown of -48.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITE and ARMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FITE | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.90% | -48.81% | +11.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.00% | -45.80% | +35.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.41% | -23.00% | +15.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.29% | — | — |
Volatility
FITE vs. ARMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FITE | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.58% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.04% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.53% | 99.09% | -71.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.04% | 99.09% | -76.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.27% | 99.09% | -75.82% |
FITE vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FITE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
FITE vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison
FITE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FITE SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF | 0.13% | 0.23% | 0.12% | 0.13% | 0.12% | 0.92% | 0.88% | 0.44% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FITE and ARMH have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FITE.
FITE has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FITE and 0.19% for ARMH.
Find the right allocation for FITE and ARMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer