FITE vs. ARMH

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF (FITE) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH).

FITE and ARMH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FITE is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Kensho Future Security Index. It was launched on Dec 26, 2017. ARMH is an actively managed fund by Precidian. It was launched on Mar 13, 2025.

Performance

FITE vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF (FITE) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FITE vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FITE SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF	0.28%	36.02%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	39.97%	-2.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FITE achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly lower than ARMH's 39.97% return.

FITE

• 1D: 4.23%
• 1M: -3.24%
• YTD: 0.28%
• 6M: 0.05%
• 1Y: 36.53%
• 3Y*: 22.85%
• 5Y*: 12.17%
• 10Y*: —

ARMH

• 1D: 9.71%
• 1M: 20.77%
• YTD: 39.97%
• 6M: 9.09%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FITE vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FITE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

FITE

SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

ARMH

Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF

Return for Risk

FITE vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FITE

FITE Risk / Return Rank: 75
FITE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FITE Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FITE Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FITE Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
FITE Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FITE vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF (FITE) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FITE	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.95	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.29	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.72	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FITE	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.35	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.80	-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between FITE and ARMH is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FITE vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

FITE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than ARMH's 2.42% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FITE SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF	0.20%	0.23%	0.12%	0.13%	0.12%	0.92%	0.88%	0.44%	1.79%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	2.42%	2.64%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FITE vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FITE drawdown since its inception was -36.90%, smaller than the maximum ARMH drawdown of -42.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITE and ARMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FITE	ARMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.90%	-42.04%	+5.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.35%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.77%	-13.75%	+1.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.50%	-16.33%	+8.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.24%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FITE	ARMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.62%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.79%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.13%	50.59%	-23.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.98%	50.59%	-28.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.94%	50.59%	-27.65%