FITE vs. ARMH

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FITE (SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. FITE is passively managed, while ARMH is actively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FITE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.

Performance

FITE vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF (FITE) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FITE

• 1D: -1.55%
• 1M: -0.04%
• 6M: 14.60%
• YTD: 27.21%
• 1Y: 43.87%
• 3Y*: 31.11%
• 5Y*: 16.60%
• 10Y*: —

ARMH

• 1D: -6.83%
• 1M: -20.34%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FITE vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FITE SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF	-2.78%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	-3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FITE and ARMH is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	0.44

Return for Risk

FITE vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FITE

FITE Risk / Return Rank: 61
FITE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FITE Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
FITE Omega Ratio Rank: 54
FITE Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FITE Martin Ratio Rank: 55

ARMH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FITE vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF (FITE) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FITE	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.49	—	—

Drawdowns

FITE vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FITE drawdown since its inception was -36.90%, which is greater than ARMH's maximum drawdown of -32.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITE and ARMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FITE	ARMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.90%	-32.10%	-4.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.35%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.42%	-32.10%	+23.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.40%	-15.18%	+7.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.88%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FITE	ARMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.08%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.71%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.01%	105.58%	-78.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.95%	105.58%	-82.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.24%	105.58%	-82.34%

FITE vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FITE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

FITE vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

FITE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FITE SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF	0.13%	0.23%	0.12%	0.13%	0.12%	0.92%	0.88%	0.44%	1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FITE and ARMH in my portfolio?

FITE and ARMH have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FITE or ARMH?

On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FITE or ARMH?

ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FITE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FITE or ARMH?

FITE has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.

What is the main difference between FITE and ARMH?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FITE and 0.19% for ARMH.