PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FITB vs. CMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FITB vs. CMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) and Comerica Incorporated (CMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FITB

1D
1.65%
1M
8.35%
YTD
15.56%
6M
13.13%
1Y
41.16%
3Y*
33.20%
5Y*
11.26%
10Y*
15.84%

CMA

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FITB vs. CMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FITB
Fifth Third Bancorp
15.56%14.75%27.20%10.41%-21.94%62.46%-5.43%35.20%-20.32%15.02%
CMA
Comerica Incorporated
2.00%46.73%16.74%-11.09%-20.38%61.53%-16.79%8.46%-19.18%29.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FITB and CMA is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.66

The correlation between FITB and CMA shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.84 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FITB:

$44.51B

CMA:

$11.79B

EPS

FITB:

$3.06

CMA:

$5.44

PE Ratio

FITB:

17.54

CMA:

16.31

PS Ratio

FITB:

2.79

CMA:

2.46

PB Ratio

FITB:

1.39

CMA:

1.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

FITB:

$13.66B

CMA:

$4.80B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FITB:

$9.10B

CMA:

$3.27B

EBITDA (TTM)

FITB:

$3.03B

CMA:

$989.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FITB vs. CMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FITB
FITB Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FITB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FITB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FITB Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FITB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FITB Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

CMA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FITB vs. CMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) and Comerica Incorporated (CMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FITBCMADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.45

FITB vs. CMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FITB vs. CMA - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FITBCMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.58%

Volatility

FITB vs. CMA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FITBCMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.30%

Dividends

FITB vs. CMA - Dividend Comparison

FITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, while CMA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMA
Comerica Incorporated
1.60%3.27%4.59%5.09%4.07%3.13%4.87%3.74%2.68%1.26%1.31%1.98%
FITB
Fifth Third Bancorp
2.93%3.29%3.41%3.94%3.84%2.62%3.92%3.06%3.14%1.98%1.97%2.59%

Financials

FITB vs. CMA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fifth Third Bancorp and Comerica Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B4.00B20222023202420252026
3.87B
1.21B
(FITB) Total Revenue
(CMA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FITB vs. CMA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fifth Third Bancorp and Comerica Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
67.3%
69.4%
Portfolio components
FITB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fifth Third Bancorp reported a gross profit of 2.60B and revenue of 3.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.3%.

CMA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comerica Incorporated reported a gross profit of 836.00M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.4%.

FITB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fifth Third Bancorp reported an operating income of 207.00M and revenue of 3.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.4%.

CMA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comerica Incorporated reported an operating income of 219.00M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.

FITB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fifth Third Bancorp reported a net income of 165.00M and revenue of 3.87B, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.

CMA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comerica Incorporated reported a net income of 176.00M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 14.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FITB and CMA have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FITB and CMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer