PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FITB vs. KRC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FITB vs. KRC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) and Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FITB achieves a 22.66% return, which is significantly higher than KRC's 7.42% return. Over the past 10 years, FITB has outperformed KRC with an annualized return of 15.74%, while KRC has yielded a comparatively lower -1.76% annualized return.


FITB

1D
-0.16%
1M
-1.15%
6M
14.33%
YTD
22.66%
1Y
42.79%
3Y*
29.98%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
15.74%
ALL TIME*
10.09%

KRC

1D
-1.82%
1M
-1.27%
6M
16.42%
YTD
7.42%
1Y
12.83%
3Y*
9.89%
5Y*
-5.86%
10Y*
-1.76%
ALL TIME*
6.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$328.73M$359.48M$365.80M
$61.04M$52.15M$57.02M

FITB vs. KRC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FITB
Fifth Third Bancorp
22.66%14.75%27.20%10.41%-21.94%62.46%-5.43%35.20%-20.32%15.02%
KRC
Kilroy Realty Corporation
7.42%-2.00%7.81%10.09%-39.25%19.30%-29.18%36.76%-13.54%4.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FITB and KRC is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 1997

0.41

The correlation between FITB and KRC shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FITB:

$51.21B

KRC:

$4.52B

EPS

FITB:

$3.04

KRC:

$1.35

PE Ratio

FITB:

18.58

KRC:

28.83

PS Ratio

FITB:

2.93

KRC:

4.20

Total Revenue (TTM)

FITB:

$14.88B

KRC:

$1.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FITB:

$10.19B

KRC:

$734.30M

EBITDA (TTM)

FITB:

$3.47B

KRC:

$564.15M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FITB vs. KRC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FITB
FITB Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FITB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FITB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FITB Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FITB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FITB Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

KRC
KRC Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
KRC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KRC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
KRC Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
KRC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
KRC Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FITB vs. KRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) and Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FITBKRCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.09

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

0.34

+1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.42

0.70

+4.72

FITB vs. KRC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FITB Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the KRC Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FITB and KRC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FITB vs. KRC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FITB drawdown since its inception was -98.13%, which is greater than KRC's maximum drawdown of -81.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITB and KRC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FITBKRCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.13%

-81.27%

-16.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.21%

-35.32%

+14.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.95%

-35.32%

+5.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.68%

-64.91%

+13.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.06%

-66.55%

+2.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.83%

-39.06%

+34.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.33%

-23.50%

-7.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.49%

16.93%

-9.44%

Volatility

FITB vs. KRC - Volatility Comparison

Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) has a higher volatility of 6.66% compared to Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC) at 6.27%. This indicates that FITB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KRC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FITBKRCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.66%

6.27%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.69%

23.18%

-3.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.33%

28.10%

-1.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.61%

34.06%

-2.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.10%

31.65%

+4.45%

Dividends

FITB vs. KRC - Dividend Comparison

FITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than KRC's 5.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FITB
Fifth Third Bancorp
2.83%3.29%3.41%3.94%3.84%2.62%3.92%3.06%3.14%1.98%1.97%2.59%
KRC
Kilroy Realty Corporation
5.56%5.78%5.34%5.42%5.48%3.07%3.43%2.28%2.85%2.21%4.61%2.21%

Financials

FITB vs. KRC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fifth Third Bancorp and Kilroy Realty Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FITB and KRC have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FITB has higher volatility (6.66%) compared to KRC (6.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FITB dropped -98.13% vs KRC's -81.27%.

FITB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FITB and KRC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer