FITB vs. FSRBX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FITB (Fifth Third Bancorp) is a stock, while FSRBX (Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio) is Financials Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FITB returned 15.84%/yr vs 11.81%/yr for FSRBX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

FITB vs. FSRBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) and Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FITB achieves a 15.56% return, which is significantly higher than FSRBX's 9.07% return. Over the past 10 years, FITB has outperformed FSRBX with an annualized return of 15.84%, while FSRBX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.81% annualized return.

FITB

• 1D: 1.65%
• 1M: 8.35%
• YTD: 15.56%
• 6M: 13.13%
• 1Y: 41.16%
• 3Y*: 33.20%
• 5Y*: 11.26%
• 10Y*: 15.84%

FSRBX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 4.95%
• YTD: 9.07%
• 6M: -1.07%
• 1Y: 24.58%
• 3Y*: 25.63%
• 5Y*: 10.72%
• 10Y*: 11.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FITB vs. FSRBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FITB Fifth Third Bancorp	15.56%	14.75%	27.20%	10.41%	-21.94%	62.46%	-5.43%	35.20%	-20.32%	15.02%
FSRBX Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio	9.07%	11.11%	30.13%	8.48%	-12.61%	38.21%	-11.73%	35.60%	-19.04%	12.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FITB and FSRBX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990	0.75

The correlation between FITB and FSRBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (all time) to 0.90 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FITB vs. FSRBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FITB

FITB Risk / Return Rank: 79
FITB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FITB Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FITB Omega Ratio Rank: 80
FITB Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FITB Martin Ratio Rank: 78

FSRBX

FSRBX Risk / Return Rank: 19
FSRBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
FSRBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
FSRBX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
FSRBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
FSRBX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FITB vs. FSRBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) and Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FITB	FSRBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	1.13	+0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	1.55	+0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.22	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.95	1.64	+0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.45	4.30	+1.15

FITB vs. FSRBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FITB Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is higher than the FSRBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FITB and FSRBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FITB vs. FSRBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FITB drawdown since its inception was -98.13%, which is greater than FSRBX's maximum drawdown of -76.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITB and FSRBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FITB	FSRBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.13%	-76.89%	-21.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.21%	-15.60%	-5.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.95%	-26.05%	-3.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.68%	-41.95%	-9.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.06%	-51.23%	-12.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.05%	-1.90%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.42%	-13.25%	-18.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.58%	5.94%	+1.64%

Volatility

FITB vs. FSRBX - Volatility Comparison

Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) has a higher volatility of 8.43% compared to Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) at 6.16%. This indicates that FITB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FITB	FSRBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.43%	6.16%	+2.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.20%	17.28%	+2.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.95%	22.78%	+3.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.82%	26.82%	+5.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.30%	29.52%	+6.78%

Dividends

FITB vs. FSRBX - Dividend Comparison

FITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, more than FSRBX's 2.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FITB Fifth Third Bancorp	2.93%	3.29%	3.41%	3.94%	3.84%	2.62%	3.92%	3.06%	3.14%	1.98%	1.97%	2.59%
FSRBX Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio	2.19%	1.47%	4.49%	5.35%	6.12%	3.36%	8.63%	5.90%	32.02%	2.57%	0.76%	5.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FITB and FSRBX in my portfolio?

FITB and FSRBX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FITB or FSRBX?

FITB has higher volatility (8.43%) compared to FSRBX (6.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FITB dropped -98.13% vs FSRBX's -76.89%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FITB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.