PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FISMX vs. FCPGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FISMX vs. FCPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Small Cap Fund (FISMX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FISMX achieves a 8.75% return, which is significantly lower than FCPGX's 18.99% return. Over the past 10 years, FISMX has underperformed FCPGX with an annualized return of 9.03%, while FCPGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.97% annualized return.


FISMX

1D
2.56%
1M
0.18%
YTD
8.75%
6M
10.42%
1Y
16.51%
3Y*
13.58%
5Y*
5.98%
10Y*
9.03%

FCPGX

1D
4.26%
1M
3.64%
YTD
18.99%
6M
16.17%
1Y
39.09%
3Y*
20.10%
5Y*
7.60%
10Y*
14.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FISMX vs. FCPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FISMX
Fidelity International Small Cap Fund
8.75%24.73%0.05%19.62%-16.66%13.44%9.98%21.45%-16.08%31.58%
FCPGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund
18.99%11.20%20.56%19.02%-25.34%10.50%36.41%36.31%-4.57%28.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FISMX and FCPGX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2004

0.63

The correlation between FISMX and FCPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FISMX vs. FCPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FISMX
FISMX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FISMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FISMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

FCPGX
FCPGX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FCPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FCPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FISMX vs. FCPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Small Cap Fund (FISMX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FISMXFCPGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.28

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

2.80

-1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.19

11.15

-5.96

FISMX vs. FCPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FISMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the FCPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FISMX and FCPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FISMX vs. FCPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FISMX drawdown since its inception was -60.94%, roughly equal to the maximum FCPGX drawdown of -59.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FISMX and FCPGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FISMXFCPGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.94%

-59.11%

-1.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.71%

-13.12%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.70%

-28.69%

+15.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.07%

-39.04%

+7.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.80%

-39.04%

+0.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.37%

-0.19%

-2.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.63%

-10.69%

+0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

3.29%

-0.25%

Volatility

FISMX vs. FCPGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity International Small Cap Fund (FISMX) is 4.94%, while Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) has a volatility of 8.73%. This indicates that FISMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FISMXFCPGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.94%

8.73%

-3.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.81%

17.37%

-6.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.78%

22.11%

-9.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.67%

23.65%

-9.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.08%

22.92%

-8.84%

FISMX vs. FCPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FISMX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than FCPGX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FISMX vs. FCPGX - Dividend Comparison

FISMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than FCPGX's 5.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCPGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund
5.37%6.38%1.37%0.00%0.00%19.27%8.19%5.31%14.35%6.88%1.53%4.32%
FISMX
Fidelity International Small Cap Fund
3.29%3.58%2.64%1.87%0.70%7.28%0.83%2.32%6.14%2.46%2.70%2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


FISMX and FCPGX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCPGX has higher volatility (8.73%) compared to FISMX (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FISMX dropped -60.94% vs FCPGX's -59.11%.

FCPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FISMX and FCPGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer