PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FISMX vs. FDLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FISMX vs. FDLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Small Cap Fund (FISMX) and Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio (FDLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FISMX achieves a 11.30% return, which is significantly higher than FDLSX's -2.38% return. Over the past 10 years, FISMX has underperformed FDLSX with an annualized return of 9.08%, while FDLSX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.26% annualized return.


FISMX

1D
0.86%
1M
1.44%
YTD
11.30%
6M
11.88%
1Y
20.19%
3Y*
13.92%
5Y*
7.07%
10Y*
9.08%

FDLSX

1D
1.11%
1M
7.95%
YTD
-2.38%
6M
-14.72%
1Y
-13.58%
3Y*
6.91%
5Y*
6.35%
10Y*
11.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FISMX vs. FDLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FISMX
Fidelity International Small Cap Fund
11.30%24.73%0.05%19.62%-16.66%13.44%9.98%21.45%-16.08%31.58%
FDLSX
Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio
-2.38%-5.30%20.17%30.14%-15.27%21.66%18.59%28.78%-7.65%29.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FISMX and FDLSX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2002

0.55

The correlation between FISMX and FDLSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FISMX vs. FDLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FISMX
FISMX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
FISMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FISMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

FDLSX
FDLSX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
FDLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
FDLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FISMX vs. FDLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Small Cap Fund (FISMX) and Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio (FDLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FISMXFDLSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

0.91

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

-0.47

+2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.37

-0.81

+7.18

FISMX vs. FDLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FISMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the FDLSX Sharpe Ratio of -0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FISMX and FDLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FISMX vs. FDLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FISMX drawdown since its inception was -60.94%, which is greater than FDLSX's maximum drawdown of -51.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FISMX and FDLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FISMXFDLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.94%

-51.58%

-9.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.71%

-28.33%

+17.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.70%

-28.33%

+15.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.07%

-28.33%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.80%

-48.44%

+9.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-20.00%

+19.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.63%

-8.95%

-1.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

16.45%

-13.42%

Volatility

FISMX vs. FDLSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity International Small Cap Fund (FISMX) is 5.04%, while Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio (FDLSX) has a volatility of 5.76%. This indicates that FISMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FISMXFDLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

5.76%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.96%

18.73%

-7.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.88%

21.61%

-8.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.68%

21.58%

-7.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.08%

22.38%

-8.30%

FISMX vs. FDLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FISMX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than FDLSX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

FISMX vs. FDLSX - Dividend Comparison

FISMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, less than FDLSX's 5.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDLSX
Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio
5.29%9.12%7.41%1.64%3.32%22.77%2.36%6.43%19.76%6.33%1.01%5.42%
FISMX
Fidelity International Small Cap Fund
3.22%3.58%2.64%1.87%0.70%7.28%0.83%2.32%6.14%2.46%2.70%2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


FISMX and FDLSX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDLSX has higher volatility (5.76%) compared to FISMX (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FISMX dropped -60.94% vs FDLSX's -51.58%.

FISMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FISMX and FDLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer