FISCX vs. COWZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FISCX (Franklin Convertible Securities Fund) and COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both funds - FISCX is a Convertible Bonds fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while COWZ is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. Over the past 5 years, FISCX returned 4.76%/yr vs 10.57%/yr for COWZ. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FISCX charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for COWZ.

Performance

FISCX vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Convertible Securities Fund (FISCX) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FISCX achieves a 11.36% return, which is significantly higher than COWZ's 8.18% return.

FISCX

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: 5.98%
• YTD: 11.36%
• 6M: 11.31%
• 1Y: 25.06%
• 3Y*: 16.62%
• 5Y*: 4.76%
• 10Y*: 12.37%

COWZ

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 2.61%
• YTD: 8.18%
• 6M: 9.03%
• 1Y: 22.23%
• 3Y*: 14.44%
• 5Y*: 10.57%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FISCX vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FISCX Franklin Convertible Securities Fund	11.36%	13.63%	16.62%	9.96%	-15.95%	-5.70%	46.28%	33.99%	4.15%	17.98%
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	8.18%	8.98%	10.64%	14.73%	0.19%	42.57%	11.65%	23.41%	-10.05%	20.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FISCX and COWZ is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2016	0.64

The correlation between FISCX and COWZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FISCX vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FISCX

FISCX Risk / Return Rank: 74
FISCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FISCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
FISCX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FISCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
FISCX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

COWZ

COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 65
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 57
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FISCX vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Convertible Securities Fund (FISCX) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FISCX	COWZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.46	2.02	+0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.39	2.98	+0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.36	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.03	4.46	-0.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.49	12.19	+4.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FISCX vs. COWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FISCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the COWZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FISCX and COWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FISCX	COWZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.46	2.02	+0.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	0.60	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	0.65	+0.16

Drawdowns

FISCX vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FISCX drawdown since its inception was -49.16%, which is greater than COWZ's maximum drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FISCX and COWZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FISCX	COWZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.16%	-38.63%	-10.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.38%	-5.00%	-1.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.95%	-22.00%	+9.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.37%	-22.00%	-12.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.91%	+0.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.91%	-4.81%	-2.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.56%	1.83%	-0.27%

Volatility

FISCX vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Convertible Securities Fund (FISCX) has a higher volatility of 2.88% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 2.56%. This indicates that FISCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FISCX	COWZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.88%	2.56%	+0.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.47%	7.12%	+1.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.45%	11.13%	-0.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.40%	17.63%	-5.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.48%	19.93%	-6.45%

FISCX vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FISCX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

FISCX vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison

FISCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.89%, more than COWZ's 1.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	1.99%	2.19%	1.82%	1.92%	1.96%	1.48%	2.54%	1.96%	1.67%	1.95%	0.13%	0.00%
FISCX Franklin Convertible Securities Fund	8.89%	9.94%	4.87%	2.22%	8.70%	8.10%	11.30%	16.05%	7.09%	7.68%	4.62%	4.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FISCX and COWZ in my portfolio?

FISCX and COWZ have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FISCX or COWZ?

FISCX has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to COWZ (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FISCX dropped -49.16% vs COWZ's -38.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FISCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.