FISCX vs. CXGCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Convertible Securities Fund (FISCX) and Calamos Global Convertible Fund (CXGCX).
FISCX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Apr 14, 1987. CXGCX is managed by Calamos. It was launched on Dec 30, 2014.
Performance
FISCX vs. CXGCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FISCX vs. CXGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FISCX Franklin Convertible Securities Fund | -3.19% | 13.63% | 16.62% | 9.96% | -15.95% | -5.70% | 46.28% | 33.99% | 4.15% | 17.98% |
CXGCX Calamos Global Convertible Fund | -1.10% | 18.49% | 10.98% | 13.48% | -22.06% | -0.31% | 38.60% | 15.18% | -2.76% | 14.25% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FISCX achieves a -3.19% return, which is significantly lower than CXGCX's -1.10% return. Over the past 10 years, FISCX has outperformed CXGCX with an annualized return of 11.24%, while CXGCX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.82% annualized return.
FISCX
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -4.91%
- YTD
- -3.19%
- 6M
- -0.23%
- 1Y
- 13.11%
- 3Y*
- 10.67%
- 5Y*
- 1.92%
- 10Y*
- 11.24%
CXGCX
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -4.76%
- YTD
- -1.10%
- 6M
- -1.39%
- 1Y
- 15.13%
- 3Y*
- 11.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.67%
- 10Y*
- 7.82%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FISCX vs. CXGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FISCX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than CXGCX's 1.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FISCX vs. CXGCX — Risk / Return Rank
FISCX
CXGCX
FISCX vs. CXGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Convertible Securities Fund (FISCX) and Calamos Global Convertible Fund (CXGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FISCX | CXGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 1.38 | -0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.50 | 1.93 | -0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.26 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 2.07 | -0.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.28 | 7.12 | -0.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FISCX | CXGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 1.38 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.28 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.83 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.73 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between FISCX and CXGCX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FISCX vs. CXGCX - Dividend Comparison
FISCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.23%, more than CXGCX's 5.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FISCX Franklin Convertible Securities Fund | 10.23% | 9.94% | 4.87% | 2.22% | 8.70% | 8.10% | 11.30% | 16.05% | 7.09% | 7.68% | 4.62% | 4.68% |
CXGCX Calamos Global Convertible Fund | 5.28% | 5.15% | 0.00% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 14.77% | 8.19% | 2.36% | 5.75% | 3.73% | 2.22% | 1.30% |
Drawdowns
FISCX vs. CXGCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FISCX drawdown since its inception was -49.16%, which is greater than CXGCX's maximum drawdown of -30.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FISCX and CXGCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FISCX | CXGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.16% | -30.74% | -18.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.45% | -6.16% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.37% | -28.88% | -5.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.37% | -30.74% | -3.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.38% | -5.55% | -0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.93% | -7.36% | +0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 1.86% | -0.07% |
Volatility
FISCX vs. CXGCX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Convertible Securities Fund (FISCX) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to Calamos Global Convertible Fund (CXGCX) at 3.72%. This indicates that FISCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CXGCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FISCX | CXGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.43% | 3.72% | +0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.34% | 7.91% | +0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.13% | 10.43% | +1.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.44% | 9.56% | +2.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.42% | 9.44% | +3.98% |