FIS vs. IWM
FIS (Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.) is a stock, while IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) is Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Over the past 10 years, FIS returned -4.09%/yr vs 10.76%/yr for IWM. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
FIS vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIS achieves a -35.64% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 19.72% return. Over the past 10 years, FIS has underperformed IWM with an annualized return of -4.09%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.76% annualized return.
FIS
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 6.96%
- 6M
- -35.43%
- YTD
- -35.64%
- 1Y
- -44.96%
- 3Y*
- -8.46%
- 5Y*
- -20.32%
- 10Y*
- -4.09%
IWM
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 12.70%
- YTD
- 19.72%
- 1Y
- 33.75%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 7.37%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
FIS vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIS Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. | -35.64% | -15.85% | 36.96% | -8.21% | -36.46% | -21.90% | 2.71% | 37.19% | 10.32% | 26.04% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 19.72% | 12.66% | 11.38% | 16.83% | -20.48% | 14.54% | 20.03% | 25.39% | -11.12% | 14.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIS and IWM is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2001 | 0.53 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FIS and IWM has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIS vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
FIS
IWM
FIS vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIS | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.73 | 1.29 | -0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 3.07 | -3.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | 10.87 | -12.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIS vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIS drawdown since its inception was -72.46%, which is greater than IWM's maximum drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIS and IWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIS | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.46% | -59.05% | -13.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.48% | -11.03% | -41.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.55% | -27.50% | -29.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.65% | -31.91% | -39.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.46% | -41.13% | -31.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.38% | -2.32% | -67.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.88% | -10.73% | -9.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.91% | 3.11% | +28.80% |
Volatility
FIS vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) has a higher volatility of 9.52% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 4.81%. This indicates that FIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIS | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.52% | 4.81% | +4.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.12% | 14.19% | +11.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.41% | 19.54% | +11.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.69% | 22.56% | +11.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.99% | 23.00% | +6.99% |
Dividends
FIS vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
FIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than IWM's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIS Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. | 4.01% | 2.41% | 1.78% | 3.46% | 2.77% | 1.43% | 0.99% | 1.01% | 1.25% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 1.72% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.91% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIS and IWM have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIS has higher volatility (9.52%) compared to IWM (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIS dropped -72.46% vs IWM's -59.05%.
IWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIS and IWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer