FIRMX vs. PHTFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund (FIRMX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid Income Fund (PHTFX).
FIRMX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Aug 30, 2007. PHTFX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Sep 29, 2014.
Performance
FIRMX vs. PHTFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIRMX vs. PHTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIRMX Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund | -0.50% | 9.95% | 4.29% | 8.07% | -11.66% | 2.77% | 8.57% | 10.57% | -1.80% | 7.08% |
PHTFX Principal LifeTime Hybrid Income Fund | -1.55% | 11.14% | 7.52% | 10.77% | -13.22% | 5.13% | 10.11% | 11.82% | -2.75% | 7.62% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIRMX achieves a -0.50% return, which is significantly higher than PHTFX's -1.55% return. Over the past 10 years, FIRMX has underperformed PHTFX with an annualized return of 3.92%, while PHTFX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.61% annualized return.
FIRMX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -3.18%
- YTD
- -0.50%
- 6M
- 0.75%
- 1Y
- 7.05%
- 3Y*
- 5.96%
- 5Y*
- 2.41%
- 10Y*
- 3.92%
PHTFX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -4.01%
- YTD
- -1.55%
- 6M
- -0.01%
- 1Y
- 8.36%
- 3Y*
- 7.77%
- 5Y*
- 3.48%
- 10Y*
- 4.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIRMX vs. PHTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIRMX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than PHTFX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FIRMX vs. PHTFX — Risk / Return Rank
FIRMX
PHTFX
FIRMX vs. PHTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund (FIRMX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid Income Fund (PHTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIRMX | PHTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.56 | 1.31 | +0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.17 | 1.84 | +0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.28 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 1.64 | +0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.41 | 7.38 | +1.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIRMX | PHTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 1.31 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.52 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | 0.76 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.73 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIRMX and PHTFX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FIRMX vs. PHTFX - Dividend Comparison
FIRMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, less than PHTFX's 4.62% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIRMX Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund | 3.16% | 3.13% | 3.02% | 2.81% | 4.54% | 3.56% | 2.48% | 2.59% | 4.65% | 8.57% | 1.67% | 1.68% |
PHTFX Principal LifeTime Hybrid Income Fund | 4.62% | 4.54% | 3.34% | 3.60% | 5.20% | 5.57% | 4.92% | 2.96% | 2.07% | 2.43% | 1.41% | 1.52% |
Drawdowns
FIRMX vs. PHTFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIRMX drawdown since its inception was -33.73%, which is greater than PHTFX's maximum drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIRMX and PHTFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIRMX | PHTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.73% | -17.26% | -16.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.44% | -4.98% | +1.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.11% | -17.26% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.11% | -17.26% | +1.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.18% | -4.01% | +0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.73% | -2.60% | -1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | 1.10% | -0.25% |
Volatility
FIRMX vs. PHTFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund (FIRMX) is 1.96%, while Principal LifeTime Hybrid Income Fund (PHTFX) has a volatility of 2.45%. This indicates that FIRMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIRMX | PHTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.96% | 2.45% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.86% | 3.88% | -1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.59% | 6.57% | -1.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.21% | 6.75% | -1.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.47% | 6.10% | -1.63% |