FIRFX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class I (FIRFX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
FIRFX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 31, 2007. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
FIRFX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIRFX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIRFX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class I | -1.37% | 13.43% | 6.55% | 11.83% | -15.66% | 8.02% | 13.09% | 17.53% | -5.07% | 14.27% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -2.99% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIRFX achieves a -1.37% return, which is significantly higher than FASGX's -2.99% return. Over the past 10 years, FIRFX has underperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 6.45%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.70% annualized return.
FIRFX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -4.93%
- YTD
- -1.37%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- 1Y
- 10.02%
- 3Y*
- 8.27%
- 5Y*
- 3.65%
- 10Y*
- 6.45%
FASGX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIRFX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIRFX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FIRFX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
FIRFX
FASGX
FIRFX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class I (FIRFX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIRFX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 1.21 | +0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.88 | 1.73 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.26 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 1.55 | +0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.34 | 6.89 | +0.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIRFX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 1.21 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.53 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | 0.70 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.60 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIRFX and FASGX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FIRFX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
FIRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than FASGX's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIRFX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class I | 2.72% | 2.66% | 2.56% | 2.43% | 4.63% | 5.08% | 3.57% | 3.80% | 7.10% | 24.68% | 2.44% | 4.49% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.56% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
FIRFX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIRFX drawdown since its inception was -41.29%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIRFX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIRFX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.29% | -47.35% | +6.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.65% | -9.07% | +3.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.56% | -23.54% | +1.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.56% | -27.20% | +5.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.95% | -7.95% | +3.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.25% | -6.74% | +1.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.32% | 2.04% | -0.72% |
Volatility
FIRFX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class I (FIRFX) is 2.93%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that FIRFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIRFX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.93% | 4.57% | -1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.56% | 7.78% | -3.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.58% | 12.82% | -5.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.12% | 12.14% | -4.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.33% | 12.56% | -4.23% |