FIQCX vs. BLNDX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

FIQCX (Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z) and BLNDX (Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, FIQCX returned 9.77%/yr vs 9.40%/yr for BLNDX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIQCX charges 0.62%/yr vs 1.27%/yr for BLNDX.

Performance

FIQCX vs. BLNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z (FIQCX) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIQCX achieves a 13.72% return, which is significantly lower than BLNDX's 16.57% return.

FIQCX

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 1.94%
• YTD: 13.72%
• 6M: 14.64%
• 1Y: 30.23%
• 3Y*: 19.13%
• 5Y*: 9.77%
• 10Y*: —

BLNDX

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 1.17%
• YTD: 16.57%
• 6M: 17.92%
• 1Y: 30.98%
• 3Y*: 12.01%
• 5Y*: 9.40%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIQCX vs. BLNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FIQCX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z	13.72%	20.94%	12.67%	19.15%	-18.53%	17.26%	19.45%
BLNDX Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional	16.57%	4.12%	13.11%	5.79%	3.71%	20.16%	16.30%

Correlation

The correlation between FIQCX and BLNDX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020	0.68

The correlation between FIQCX and BLNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FIQCX vs. BLNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIQCX

FIQCX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FIQCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FIQCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FIQCX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
FIQCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FIQCX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

BLNDX

BLNDX Risk / Return Rank: 77
BLNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
BLNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
BLNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
BLNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
BLNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIQCX vs. BLNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z (FIQCX) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FIQCX	BLNDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	2.41	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.42	3.16	+0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.42	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.25	6.44	-3.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.41	20.86	-6.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FIQCX vs. BLNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIQCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the BLNDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIQCX and BLNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIQCX	BLNDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.48	2.41	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	0.81	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	1.05	-0.32

Drawdowns

FIQCX vs. BLNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIQCX drawdown since its inception was -30.97%, which is greater than BLNDX's maximum drawdown of -17.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIQCX and BLNDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIQCX	BLNDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.97%	-17.69%	-13.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.34%	-4.75%	-4.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.35%	-17.69%	+2.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.94%	-17.69%	-8.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.41%	-1.65%	+1.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.48%	-3.19%	-2.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	1.48%	+0.62%

Volatility

FIQCX vs. BLNDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z (FIQCX) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX) at 2.98%. This indicates that FIQCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIQCX	BLNDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.82%	2.98%	+0.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.93%	9.51%	+0.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.25%	12.70%	-0.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.63%	11.66%	+2.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.66%	11.75%	+4.91%

FIQCX vs. BLNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIQCX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than BLNDX's 1.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIQCX vs. BLNDX - Dividend Comparison

FIQCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, more than BLNDX's 0.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BLNDX Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional	0.63%	0.73%	5.74%	3.71%	2.67%	6.11%	1.21%	0.00%	0.00%
FIQCX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z	5.05%	5.74%	3.61%	1.43%	5.21%	3.30%	2.07%	5.66%	5.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIQCX and BLNDX in my portfolio?

FIQCX and BLNDX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIQCX or BLNDX?

FIQCX has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to BLNDX (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIQCX dropped -30.97% vs BLNDX's -17.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FIQCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.