FINT vs. BPH

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

FINT (Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FINT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Frontier, while BPH is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Precidian. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. FINT charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.

Performance

FINT vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF (FINT) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FINT

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: -0.94%
• 6M: 10.13%
• YTD: 13.87%
• 1Y: 26.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BPH

• 1D: 1.14%
• 1M: -2.64%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FINT vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FINT Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF	0.58%
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	-2.04%

Correlation

The correlation between FINT and BPH is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026	-0.01

Return for Risk

FINT vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FINT

FINT Risk / Return Rank: 65
FINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
FINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
FINT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
FINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
FINT Martin Ratio Rank: 68

BPH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FINT vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF (FINT) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FINT	BPH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.59	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.75	—	—

Drawdowns

FINT vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FINT drawdown since its inception was -13.64%, smaller than the maximum BPH drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FINT and BPH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FINT	BPH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.64%	-15.58%	+1.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.35%	-5.35%	+3.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.57%	-6.73%	+5.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.67%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FINT	BPH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.78%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.39%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.22%	28.63%	-13.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.28%	28.63%	-12.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.28%	28.63%	-12.35%

FINT vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FINT has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

FINT vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

FINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, more than BPH's 0.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	0.51%	0.00%
FINT Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF	1.89%	2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FINT and BPH in my portfolio?

FINT and BPH have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FINT or BPH?

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FINT or BPH?

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for FINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FINT or BPH?

FINT has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 0.51% for BPH.

What is the main difference between FINT and BPH?

FINT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BPH is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Frontier and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for FINT and 0.19% for BPH.