FILFX vs. VEA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FILFX (Strategic Advisers International Fund) and VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FILFX returned 10.51%/yr vs 10.72%/yr for VEA. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FILFX charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VEA.

Performance

FILFX vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategic Advisers International Fund (FILFX) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FILFX achieves a 11.70% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 13.11% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FILFX having a 10.51% annualized return and VEA not far ahead at 10.72%.

FILFX

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 2.85%
• YTD: 11.70%
• 6M: 11.52%
• 1Y: 25.86%
• 3Y*: 17.82%
• 5Y*: 8.70%
• 10Y*: 10.51%

VEA

• 1D: -3.07%
• 1M: 0.11%
• YTD: 13.11%
• 6M: 12.98%
• 1Y: 30.28%
• 3Y*: 19.47%
• 5Y*: 9.50%
• 10Y*: 10.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FILFX vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FILFX Strategic Advisers International Fund	11.70%	30.56%	4.79%	18.21%	-17.44%	10.82%	14.90%	24.04%	-15.25%	26.24%
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF	13.11%	35.16%	3.15%	17.93%	-15.34%	11.66%	9.71%	22.62%	-14.75%	26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FILFX and VEA is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2007	0.94

The correlation between FILFX and VEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.94 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FILFX vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FILFX

FILFX Risk / Return Rank: 53
FILFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
FILFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
FILFX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
FILFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
FILFX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

VEA

VEA Risk / Return Rank: 55
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 55
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FILFX vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers International Fund (FILFX) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FILFX	VEA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	1.81	+0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	2.48	+0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.33	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.73	2.62	+0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.08	10.06	+0.01

FILFX vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FILFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FILFX and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FILFX vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FILFX drawdown since its inception was -60.75%, roughly equal to the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FILFX and VEA.

Drawdown Indicators

	FILFX	VEA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.75%	-60.68%	-0.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.19%	-11.63%	+0.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.60%	-13.45%	-0.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.88%	-29.71%	-4.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.88%	-35.73%	+1.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.07%	+3.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.34%	-13.26%	-0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.82%	3.02%	-0.20%

Volatility

FILFX vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Strategic Advisers International Fund (FILFX) is 5.02%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 7.09%. This indicates that FILFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FILFX	VEA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.02%	7.09%	-2.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.74%	14.74%	-2.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.57%	16.79%	-1.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.48%	16.76%	-0.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.51%	17.21%	-0.70%

FILFX vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FILFX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

FILFX vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

FILFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.46%, more than VEA's 2.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FILFX Strategic Advisers International Fund	9.46%	7.33%	3.91%	2.45%	4.58%	8.87%	1.75%	3.26%	6.71%	3.13%	2.16%	3.21%
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF	2.58%	3.22%	3.35%	3.15%	2.91%	3.16%	2.04%	3.04%	3.35%	2.77%	3.05%	2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FILFX and VEA in my portfolio?

FILFX and VEA have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FILFX or VEA?

VEA has higher volatility (7.09%) compared to FILFX (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FILFX dropped -60.75% vs VEA's -60.68%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FILFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.