PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FILFX vs. SCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FILFX vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategic Advisers International Fund (FILFX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FILFX achieves a 11.70% return, which is significantly higher than SCHX's 8.04% return. Over the past 10 years, FILFX has underperformed SCHX with an annualized return of 10.51%, while SCHX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.47% annualized return.


FILFX

1D
0.20%
1M
2.85%
YTD
11.70%
6M
11.52%
1Y
25.86%
3Y*
17.82%
5Y*
8.70%
10Y*
10.51%

SCHX

1D
-1.29%
1M
-1.16%
YTD
8.04%
6M
7.00%
1Y
23.07%
3Y*
20.75%
5Y*
12.44%
10Y*
15.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FILFX vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FILFX
Strategic Advisers International Fund
11.70%30.56%4.79%18.21%-17.44%10.82%14.90%24.04%-15.25%26.24%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
8.04%17.46%24.88%26.84%-19.41%26.81%20.81%31.22%-4.66%21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FILFX and SCHX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009

0.77

The correlation between FILFX and SCHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (3 years) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FILFX vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FILFX
FILFX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FILFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FILFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FILFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FILFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FILFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHX
SCHX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FILFX vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers International Fund (FILFX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FILFXSCHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.33

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

2.57

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.08

11.26

-1.18

FILFX vs. SCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FILFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the SCHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FILFX and SCHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FILFX vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FILFX drawdown since its inception was -60.75%, which is greater than SCHX's maximum drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FILFX and SCHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FILFXSCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.75%

-34.33%

-26.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.19%

-9.02%

-2.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.60%

-19.04%

+5.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.88%

-25.41%

-8.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.88%

-34.33%

+0.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.11%

+3.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.34%

-3.96%

-9.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

2.05%

+0.77%

Volatility

FILFX vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison

Strategic Advisers International Fund (FILFX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) have volatilities of 5.02% and 4.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FILFXSCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.02%

4.89%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.74%

9.94%

+2.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.57%

12.65%

+2.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.48%

17.23%

-0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.51%

18.16%

-1.65%

FILFX vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FILFX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FILFX vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison

FILFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.46%, more than SCHX's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FILFX
Strategic Advisers International Fund
9.46%7.33%3.91%2.45%4.58%8.87%1.75%3.26%6.71%3.13%2.16%3.21%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
1.03%1.09%1.22%1.39%1.64%1.22%1.64%1.82%2.02%1.70%1.92%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


FILFX and SCHX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FILFX has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to SCHX (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FILFX dropped -60.75% vs SCHX's -34.33%.

FILFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FILFX and SCHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer