PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FILFX vs. EFA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FILFX vs. EFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategic Advisers International Fund (FILFX) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FILFX achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly higher than EFA's 8.42% return. Over the past 10 years, FILFX has outperformed EFA with an annualized return of 9.62%, while EFA has yielded a comparatively lower 9.11% annualized return.


FILFX

1D
0.54%
1M
4.55%
YTD
10.08%
6M
12.83%
1Y
23.20%
3Y*
17.21%
5Y*
8.15%
10Y*
9.62%

EFA

1D
-0.86%
1M
3.40%
YTD
8.42%
6M
10.94%
1Y
21.06%
3Y*
16.44%
5Y*
8.29%
10Y*
9.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FILFX vs. EFA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FILFX
Strategic Advisers International Fund
10.08%30.56%4.79%18.21%-17.44%10.82%14.90%24.04%-15.25%26.24%
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
8.42%31.55%3.49%18.36%-14.39%11.45%7.60%22.04%-13.82%25.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FILFX and EFA is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2006

0.94

The correlation between FILFX and EFA shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.94 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FILFX vs. EFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FILFX
FILFX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FILFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FILFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FILFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FILFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FILFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

EFA
EFA Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
EFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFA Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
EFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFA Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FILFX vs. EFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers International Fund (FILFX) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FILFXEFADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.80

1.41

+0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.66

2.04

+0.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.26

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

1.85

+0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.87

6.94

+1.93

FILFX vs. EFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FILFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the EFA Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FILFX and EFA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FILFXEFADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

1.41

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.51

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.53

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.31

0.00

Drawdowns

FILFX vs. EFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FILFX drawdown since its inception was -60.75%, roughly equal to the maximum EFA drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FILFX and EFA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FILFXEFADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.75%

-61.04%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.19%

-11.42%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.60%

-14.05%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.88%

-29.53%

-4.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.88%

-34.19%

+0.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.46%

+1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.37%

-11.93%

-1.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

3.04%

-0.11%

Volatility

FILFX vs. EFA - Volatility Comparison

Strategic Advisers International Fund (FILFX) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) have volatilities of 4.97% and 4.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FILFXEFADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.97%

4.98%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.23%

12.51%

-0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.07%

15.05%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.38%

16.48%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.52%

17.26%

-0.74%

FILFX vs. EFA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FILFX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than EFA's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

FILFX vs. EFA - Dividend Comparison

FILFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.60%, more than EFA's 3.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
3.12%3.38%3.24%2.98%2.69%3.33%2.13%3.10%3.39%2.57%3.07%2.76%
FILFX
Strategic Advisers International Fund
9.60%7.33%3.91%2.45%4.58%8.87%1.75%3.26%6.71%3.13%2.16%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


FILFX and EFA have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFA has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to FILFX (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FILFX dropped -60.75% vs EFA's -61.04%.

FILFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FILFX and EFA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer