PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FILFX vs. EFA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FILFX vs. EFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategic Advisers International Fund (FILFX) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FILFX having a 12.22% return and EFA slightly lower at 12.15%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FILFX having a 9.86% annualized return and EFA not far behind at 9.44%.


FILFX

1D
-0.59%
1M
1.06%
6M
6.17%
YTD
12.22%
1Y
24.84%
3Y*
16.63%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*
9.86%
ALL TIME*
5.95%

EFA

1D
0.42%
1M
1.58%
6M
6.21%
YTD
12.15%
1Y
25.62%
3Y*
17.31%
5Y*
9.12%
10Y*
9.44%
ALL TIME*
6.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.19B$1.11B$1.37B
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FILFX vs. EFA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FILFX
Strategic Advisers International Fund
12.22%30.56%4.79%18.21%-17.44%10.82%14.90%24.04%-15.25%26.24%
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
12.15%31.55%3.49%18.36%-14.39%11.45%7.60%22.04%-13.82%25.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FILFX and EFA is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2006

0.94

The correlation between FILFX and EFA shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.94 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FILFX vs. EFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FILFX
FILFX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FILFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FILFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FILFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FILFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FILFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

EFA
EFA Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
EFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFA Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
EFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFA Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FILFX vs. EFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers International Fund (FILFX) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FILFXEFADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.29

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

2.25

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.62

8.51

+1.10

FILFX vs. EFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FILFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the EFA Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FILFX and EFA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FILFX vs. EFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FILFX drawdown since its inception was -60.75%, roughly equal to the maximum EFA drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FILFX and EFA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FILFXEFADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.75%

-61.04%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.19%

-11.42%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.60%

-14.05%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.88%

-29.53%

-4.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.88%

-34.19%

+0.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-0.21%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.27%

-11.86%

-1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

3.02%

-0.14%

Volatility

FILFX vs. EFA - Volatility Comparison

Strategic Advisers International Fund (FILFX) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) have volatilities of 4.41% and 4.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FILFXEFADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

4.53%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.10%

13.68%

-0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.79%

15.78%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.53%

16.62%

-0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.29%

17.01%

-0.72%

FILFX vs. EFA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FILFX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than EFA's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

FILFX vs. EFA - Dividend Comparison

FILFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.42%, more than EFA's 3.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
3.17%3.38%3.24%2.98%2.69%3.33%2.13%3.10%3.39%2.57%3.07%2.76%
FILFX
Strategic Advisers International Fund
9.42%7.33%3.91%2.45%4.58%8.87%1.75%3.26%6.71%3.13%2.16%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


FILFX and EFA have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFA has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to FILFX (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FILFX dropped -60.75% vs EFA's -61.04%.

FILFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FILFX and EFA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer