FILFX vs. IEMG
FILFX (Strategic Advisers International Fund) and IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both funds - FILFX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while IEMG is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). Over the past 10 years, FILFX returned 9.62%/yr vs 10.41%/yr for IEMG. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FILFX charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for IEMG.
Performance
FILFX vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FILFX achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly lower than IEMG's 26.21% return. Over the past 10 years, FILFX has underperformed IEMG with an annualized return of 9.62%, while IEMG has yielded a comparatively higher 10.41% annualized return.
FILFX
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 4.55%
- YTD
- 10.08%
- 6M
- 12.83%
- 1Y
- 23.20%
- 3Y*
- 17.21%
- 5Y*
- 8.15%
- 10Y*
- 9.62%
IEMG
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 7.97%
- YTD
- 26.21%
- 6M
- 28.63%
- 1Y
- 52.58%
- 3Y*
- 23.55%
- 5Y*
- 7.58%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
FILFX vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FILFX Strategic Advisers International Fund | 10.08% | 30.56% | 4.79% | 18.21% | -17.44% | 10.82% | 14.90% | 24.04% | -15.25% | 26.24% |
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 26.21% | 32.56% | 6.50% | 11.52% | -19.98% | -0.64% | 17.87% | 17.81% | -14.92% | 37.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between FILFX and IEMG is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012 | 0.75 |
The correlation between FILFX and IEMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FILFX vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank
FILFX
IEMG
FILFX vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers International Fund (FILFX) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FILFX | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.50 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 4.00 | -1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.87 | 15.38 | -6.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FILFX | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 2.72 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.41 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.52 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.35 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
FILFX vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FILFX drawdown since its inception was -60.75%, which is greater than IEMG's maximum drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FILFX and IEMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FILFX | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.75% | -38.71% | -22.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.19% | -13.21% | +2.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.60% | -17.21% | +3.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.88% | -35.83% | +1.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.88% | -38.71% | +4.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.34% | +1.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.37% | -12.97% | -0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 3.43% | -0.50% |
Volatility
FILFX vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Strategic Advisers International Fund (FILFX) is 4.97%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a volatility of 8.31%. This indicates that FILFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FILFX | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.97% | 8.31% | -3.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.23% | 16.93% | -4.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.07% | 19.43% | -4.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 18.38% | -2.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 20.03% | -3.51% |
FILFX vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FILFX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
FILFX vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison
FILFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.60%, more than IEMG's 2.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FILFX Strategic Advisers International Fund | 9.60% | 7.33% | 3.91% | 2.45% | 4.58% | 8.87% | 1.75% | 3.26% | 6.71% | 3.13% | 2.16% | 3.21% |
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.18% | 2.75% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 2.71% | 3.06% | 1.87% | 3.15% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 2.28% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FILFX and IEMG have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IEMG has higher volatility (8.31%) compared to FILFX (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FILFX dropped -60.75% vs IEMG's -38.71%.
IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FILFX and IEMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer