FILDX vs. GPARX
Compare and contrast key facts about Frost Low Duration Bond Fund (FILDX) and GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund (GPARX).
FILDX is managed by Frost Funds. It was launched on Apr 25, 2008. GPARX is managed by GuidePath. It was launched on Apr 29, 2011.
Performance
FILDX vs. GPARX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FILDX vs. GPARX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FILDX Frost Low Duration Bond Fund | -0.09% | 5.26% | 4.87% | 5.71% | -4.80% | -0.35% | 4.25% | 3.22% | 1.83% | 1.77% |
GPARX GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund | 5.39% | 7.42% | 4.20% | 6.87% | -10.82% | 0.75% | 3.92% | 7.47% | -1.64% | 4.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FILDX achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly lower than GPARX's 5.39% return. Over the past 10 years, FILDX has underperformed GPARX with an annualized return of 2.20%, while GPARX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.33% annualized return.
FILDX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 1.00%
- 1Y
- 3.74%
- 3Y*
- 4.72%
- 5Y*
- 2.05%
- 10Y*
- 2.20%
GPARX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- YTD
- 5.39%
- 6M
- 7.20%
- 1Y
- 11.06%
- 3Y*
- 7.14%
- 5Y*
- 2.64%
- 10Y*
- 3.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FILDX vs. GPARX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FILDX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than GPARX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FILDX vs. GPARX — Risk / Return Rank
FILDX
GPARX
FILDX vs. GPARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frost Low Duration Bond Fund (FILDX) and GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund (GPARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FILDX | GPARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.93 | 1.73 | +0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.89 | 2.29 | +0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.38 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.59 | 2.44 | +1.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.65 | 11.20 | +1.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FILDX | GPARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | 1.73 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.54 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.21 | 0.79 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.76 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between FILDX and GPARX is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FILDX vs. GPARX - Dividend Comparison
FILDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, more than GPARX's 3.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FILDX Frost Low Duration Bond Fund | 3.91% | 3.61% | 4.45% | 3.65% | 1.86% | 1.98% | 2.02% | 2.18% | 1.90% | 1.76% | 1.63% | 1.35% |
GPARX GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund | 3.14% | 3.31% | 4.99% | 4.81% | 2.42% | 1.99% | 2.45% | 2.76% | 2.27% | 1.60% | 3.17% | 2.15% |
Drawdowns
FILDX vs. GPARX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FILDX drawdown since its inception was -7.20%, smaller than the maximum GPARX drawdown of -15.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FILDX and GPARX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FILDX | GPARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.20% | -15.56% | +8.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.10% | -4.68% | +3.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.20% | -15.56% | +8.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -7.20% | -15.56% | +8.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -0.88% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.61% | -2.40% | +0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.31% | 1.02% | -0.71% |
Volatility
FILDX vs. GPARX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Frost Low Duration Bond Fund (FILDX) is 0.71%, while GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund (GPARX) has a volatility of 2.14%. This indicates that FILDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FILDX | GPARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.71% | 2.14% | -1.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.16% | 6.13% | -4.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00% | 6.57% | -4.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.15% | 4.94% | -2.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.82% | 4.23% | -2.41% |