PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FILDX vs. FICEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FILDX vs. FICEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frost Low Duration Bond Fund (FILDX) and Frost Growth Equity Fund (FICEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FILDX achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly lower than FICEX's 0.82% return. Over the past 10 years, FILDX has underperformed FICEX with an annualized return of 2.19%, while FICEX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.99% annualized return.


FILDX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.40%
6M
0.66%
1Y
3.22%
3Y*
4.80%
5Y*
2.09%
10Y*
2.19%

FICEX

1D
-1.60%
1M
-2.71%
YTD
0.82%
6M
-0.20%
1Y
13.17%
3Y*
19.76%
5Y*
10.88%
10Y*
16.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FILDX vs. FICEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FILDX
Frost Low Duration Bond Fund
0.40%5.26%4.87%5.71%-4.80%-0.35%4.25%3.22%1.83%1.77%
FICEX
Frost Growth Equity Fund
0.82%15.00%30.28%45.24%-31.98%25.23%32.72%33.54%2.63%31.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FILDX and FICEX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

-0.12

The correlation between FILDX and FICEX shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FILDX vs. FICEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FILDX
FILDX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FILDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FILDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FILDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FILDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FILDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

FICEX
FICEX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
FICEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FICEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
FICEX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
FICEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
FICEX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FILDX vs. FICEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frost Low Duration Bond Fund (FILDX) and Frost Growth Equity Fund (FICEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FILDXFICEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.17

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

0.79

+2.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.62

2.42

+8.20

FILDX vs. FICEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FILDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the FICEX Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FILDX and FICEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FILDX vs. FICEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FILDX drawdown since its inception was -7.20%, smaller than the maximum FICEX drawdown of -50.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FILDX and FICEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FILDXFICEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.20%

-50.03%

+42.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.10%

-18.43%

+17.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.14%

-32.32%

+31.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.20%

-35.13%

+27.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.20%

-35.13%

+27.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-5.58%

+5.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.60%

-11.19%

+9.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.32%

5.98%

-5.66%

Volatility

FILDX vs. FICEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Frost Low Duration Bond Fund (FILDX) is 0.47%, while Frost Growth Equity Fund (FICEX) has a volatility of 6.03%. This indicates that FILDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FICEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FILDXFICEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.47%

6.03%

-5.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.26%

12.58%

-11.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74%

15.79%

-14.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.18%

25.42%

-23.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.83%

23.11%

-21.28%

FILDX vs. FICEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FILDX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than FICEX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

FILDX vs. FICEX - Dividend Comparison

FILDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, less than FICEX's 21.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FICEX
Frost Growth Equity Fund
21.76%21.94%22.19%16.16%12.25%12.50%3.59%10.57%16.11%28.09%10.86%12.51%
FILDX
Frost Low Duration Bond Fund
4.23%3.61%4.45%3.65%1.86%1.98%2.02%2.18%1.90%1.76%1.63%1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


FILDX and FICEX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FICEX has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to FILDX (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FILDX dropped -7.20% vs FICEX's -50.03%.

FILDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FILDX and FICEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer