PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FILDX vs. FIJEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FILDX vs. FIJEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frost Low Duration Bond Fund (FILDX) and Frost Total Return Bond Fund (FIJEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FILDX achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly lower than FIJEX's 1.17% return. Over the past 10 years, FILDX has underperformed FIJEX with an annualized return of 2.23%, while FIJEX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.54% annualized return.


FILDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.11%
YTD
0.51%
6M
0.76%
1Y
3.85%
3Y*
4.84%
5Y*
2.11%
10Y*
2.23%

FIJEX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.55%
YTD
1.17%
6M
0.88%
1Y
5.36%
3Y*
6.07%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*
3.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FILDX vs. FIJEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FILDX
Frost Low Duration Bond Fund
0.51%5.26%4.87%5.71%-4.80%-0.35%4.25%3.22%1.83%1.77%
FIJEX
Frost Total Return Bond Fund
1.17%4.83%6.44%8.64%-5.30%3.45%3.49%5.38%1.38%4.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FILDX and FIJEX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2001

0.75

The correlation between FILDX and FIJEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FILDX vs. FIJEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FILDX
FILDX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FILDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FILDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FILDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FILDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FILDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FIJEX
FIJEX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FIJEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIJEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIJEX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FIJEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIJEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FILDX vs. FIJEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frost Low Duration Bond Fund (FILDX) and Frost Total Return Bond Fund (FIJEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FILDXFIJEXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.13

1.70

+0.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.27

2.51

+0.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.31

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

2.35

+1.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.12

7.21

+4.91

FILDX vs. FIJEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FILDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the FIJEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FILDX and FIJEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FILDXFIJEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

1.70

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.93

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.22

1.10

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

0.97

-0.01

Drawdowns

FILDX vs. FIJEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FILDX drawdown since its inception was -7.20%, smaller than the maximum FIJEX drawdown of -16.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FILDX and FIJEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FILDXFIJEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.20%

-16.82%

+9.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.10%

-2.25%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.14%

-3.40%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.20%

-7.52%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.20%

-11.60%

+4.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-0.72%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.60%

-2.86%

+1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.31%

0.73%

-0.42%

Volatility

FILDX vs. FIJEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Frost Low Duration Bond Fund (FILDX) is 0.51%, while Frost Total Return Bond Fund (FIJEX) has a volatility of 1.19%. This indicates that FILDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIJEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FILDXFIJEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.51%

1.19%

-0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.23%

2.22%

-0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76%

3.11%

-1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.17%

3.70%

-1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.83%

3.22%

-1.39%

FILDX vs. FIJEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FILDX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than FIJEX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

FILDX vs. FIJEX - Dividend Comparison

FILDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, less than FIJEX's 5.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIJEX
Frost Total Return Bond Fund
5.72%4.64%5.23%5.53%4.69%3.31%3.82%3.79%3.63%3.68%4.03%4.14%
FILDX
Frost Low Duration Bond Fund
4.22%3.61%4.45%3.65%1.86%1.98%2.02%2.18%1.90%1.76%1.63%1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


FILDX and FIJEX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIJEX has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to FILDX (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FILDX dropped -7.20% vs FIJEX's -16.82%.

FILDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FILDX and FIJEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer