PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIJDX vs. FSAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIJDX vs. FSAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z (FIJDX) and Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FIJDX having a -10.74% return and FSAGX slightly lower at -10.75%.


FIJDX

1D
-4.33%
1M
-15.15%
YTD
-10.74%
6M
-14.51%
1Y
40.06%
3Y*
36.46%
5Y*
15.05%
10Y*

FSAGX

1D
-4.32%
1M
-15.15%
YTD
-10.75%
6M
-14.54%
1Y
39.98%
3Y*
36.34%
5Y*
14.91%
10Y*
9.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIJDX vs. FSAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIJDX
Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z
-10.74%143.25%15.10%-0.26%-13.32%-10.33%27.00%35.74%4.09%
FSAGX
Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio
-10.75%143.05%14.97%-0.37%-13.46%-10.44%26.83%35.50%3.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FIJDX and FSAGX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

1.00

The correlation between FIJDX and FSAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIJDX vs. FSAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIJDX
FIJDX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
FIJDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIJDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIJDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FIJDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIJDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

FSAGX
FSAGX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
FSAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FSAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIJDX vs. FSAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z (FIJDX) and Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIJDXFSAGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.18

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

1.13

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.99

2.98

+0.01

FIJDX vs. FSAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIJDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the FSAGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIJDX and FSAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIJDX vs. FSAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIJDX drawdown since its inception was -50.43%, smaller than the maximum FSAGX drawdown of -77.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIJDX and FSAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIJDXFSAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.43%

-77.21%

+26.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.39%

-35.40%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.39%

-35.40%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.91%

-45.94%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.63%

-34.64%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.54%

-33.34%

+14.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.41%

13.42%

-0.01%

Volatility

FIJDX vs. FSAGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z (FIJDX) and Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) have volatilities of 18.10% and 18.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIJDXFSAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.10%

18.11%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.30%

38.31%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.49%

45.50%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.20%

34.22%

-0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.70%

33.40%

+1.30%

FIJDX vs. FSAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIJDX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FSAGX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIJDX vs. FSAGX - Dividend Comparison

FIJDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%, which matches FSAGX's 5.75% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FIJDX
Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z
5.74%2.17%3.63%1.16%0.38%1.71%4.54%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSAGX
Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio
5.75%2.17%3.62%0.99%0.36%1.60%4.40%0.40%0.00%0.22%3.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FIJDX and FSAGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSAGX has higher volatility (18.11%) compared to FIJDX (18.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIJDX dropped -50.43% vs FSAGX's -77.21%.

FIJDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIJDX and FSAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer