FIJDX vs. CEF
FIJDX (Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z) and CEF (Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust) are both Gold funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FIJDX returned 15.05%/yr vs 16.18%/yr for CEF. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIJDX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for CEF.
Performance
FIJDX vs. CEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIJDX achieves a -10.74% return, which is significantly higher than CEF's -13.10% return.
FIJDX
- 1D
- -4.33%
- 1M
- -15.15%
- YTD
- -10.74%
- 6M
- -14.51%
- 1Y
- 40.06%
- 3Y*
- 36.46%
- 5Y*
- 15.05%
- 10Y*
- —
CEF
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- -16.56%
- YTD
- -13.10%
- 6M
- -15.68%
- 1Y
- 31.22%
- 3Y*
- 30.11%
- 5Y*
- 16.18%
- 10Y*
- 11.18%
FIJDX vs. CEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIJDX Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z | -10.74% | 143.25% | 15.10% | -0.26% | -13.32% | -10.33% | 27.00% | 35.74% | 4.09% |
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | -13.10% | 92.76% | 24.07% | 6.80% | 1.07% | -8.32% | 31.99% | 16.91% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIJDX and CEF is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.78 |
The correlation between FIJDX and CEF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIJDX vs. CEF — Risk / Return Rank
FIJDX
CEF
FIJDX vs. CEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z (FIJDX) and Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIJDX | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.18 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | 0.93 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.99 | 2.52 | +0.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIJDX vs. CEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIJDX drawdown since its inception was -50.43%, smaller than the maximum CEF drawdown of -62.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIJDX and CEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIJDX | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.43% | -62.29% | +11.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.39% | -33.61% | -1.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.39% | -33.61% | -1.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.91% | -33.61% | -12.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.63% | -32.78% | -1.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.54% | -27.34% | +8.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.41% | 12.41% | +1.00% |
Volatility
FIJDX vs. CEF - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z (FIJDX) has a higher volatility of 18.10% compared to Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF) at 11.86%. This indicates that FIJDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIJDX | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.10% | 11.86% | +6.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.30% | 36.69% | +1.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.49% | 39.52% | +5.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.20% | 24.72% | +9.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.70% | 22.07% | +12.63% |
FIJDX vs. CEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIJDX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CEF's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIJDX vs. CEF - Dividend Comparison
FIJDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%, while CEF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.09% | 0.10% |
FIJDX Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z | 5.74% | 2.17% | 3.63% | 1.16% | 0.38% | 1.71% | 4.54% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIJDX and CEF have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIJDX has higher volatility (18.10%) compared to CEF (11.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIJDX dropped -50.43% vs CEF's -62.29%.
FIJDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIJDX and CEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer