FIHBX vs. FGSAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FIHBX (Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund) and FGSAX (Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - FIHBX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Federated, while FGSAX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Federated. Over the past 10 years, FIHBX returned 5.05%/yr vs 15.12%/yr for FGSAX. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FIHBX charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for FGSAX.

Performance

FIHBX vs. FGSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX) and Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIHBX achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than FGSAX's 1.66% return. Over the past 10 years, FIHBX has underperformed FGSAX with an annualized return of 5.05%, while FGSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.12% annualized return.

FIHBX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 1.27%
• 6M: 2.24%
• 1Y: 6.62%
• 3Y*: 8.32%
• 5Y*: 3.49%
• 10Y*: 5.05%

FGSAX

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: 2.76%
• YTD: 1.66%
• 6M: 2.62%
• 1Y: 5.40%
• 3Y*: 19.76%
• 5Y*: 10.98%
• 10Y*: 15.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIHBX vs. FGSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FIHBX Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund	1.27%	8.59%	6.40%	13.17%	-12.64%	3.92%	5.99%	15.01%	-2.80%	7.19%
FGSAX Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund	1.66%	10.54%	32.97%	27.05%	-24.60%	22.39%	35.50%	27.95%	-3.23%	24.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FIHBX and FGSAX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2002	0.34

The correlation between FIHBX and FGSAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FIHBX vs. FGSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIHBX

FIHBX Risk / Return Rank: 64
FIHBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
FIHBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FIHBX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FIHBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
FIHBX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

FGSAX

FGSAX Risk / Return Rank: 5
FGSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FGSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
FGSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5
FGSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
FGSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIHBX vs. FGSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX) and Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FIHBX	FGSAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	0.32	+1.64
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.46	0.59	+2.87
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.08	+0.44
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.71	0.40	+2.32
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.30	1.11	+13.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FIHBX vs. FGSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIHBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the FGSAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIHBX and FGSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIHBX	FGSAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.96	0.32	+1.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.49	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88	0.68	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.36	0.48	+0.88

Drawdowns

FIHBX vs. FGSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIHBX drawdown since its inception was -31.05%, smaller than the maximum FGSAX drawdown of -66.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIHBX and FGSAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIHBX	FGSAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.05%	-66.17%	+35.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.45%	-13.73%	+11.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.60%	-24.51%	+20.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.35%	-35.79%	+19.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.67%	-37.19%	+15.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.06%	+3.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.30%	-16.15%	+13.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.46%	4.90%	-4.44%

Volatility

FIHBX vs. FGSAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX) is 1.08%, while Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX) has a volatility of 3.54%. This indicates that FIHBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIHBX	FGSAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.08%	3.54%	-2.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.74%	13.72%	-10.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.39%	16.85%	-13.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.19%	22.41%	-17.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.76%	22.32%	-16.56%

FIHBX vs. FGSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIHBX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FGSAX's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIHBX vs. FGSAX - Dividend Comparison

FIHBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.44%, more than FGSAX's 4.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGSAX Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund	4.84%	4.92%	4.32%	0.00%	2.31%	25.75%	7.07%	8.13%	14.46%	13.93%	0.89%	25.34%
FIHBX Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund	6.44%	6.29%	5.94%	5.93%	4.58%	4.25%	5.14%	5.79%	6.24%	5.55%	5.75%	6.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIHBX and FGSAX in my portfolio?

FIHBX and FGSAX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIHBX or FGSAX?

FGSAX has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to FIHBX (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIHBX dropped -31.05% vs FGSAX's -66.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FIHBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.