FGSAX vs. XMMO
Compare and contrast key facts about Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO).
FGSAX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Aug 23, 1984. XMMO is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on Mar 3, 2005.
Performance
FGSAX vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGSAX vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGSAX Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund | -6.56% | 10.54% | 32.97% | 27.05% | -24.60% | 22.39% | 35.50% | 27.95% | -3.23% | 24.38% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 6.86% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -16.02% | 16.69% | 29.17% | 36.78% | 6.12% | 37.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGSAX achieves a -6.56% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 6.86% return. Over the past 10 years, FGSAX has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 13.87%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 18.41% annualized return.
FGSAX
- 1D
- 3.29%
- 1M
- -5.16%
- YTD
- -6.56%
- 6M
- -8.51%
- 1Y
- 11.71%
- 3Y*
- 16.75%
- 5Y*
- 9.60%
- 10Y*
- 13.87%
XMMO
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- YTD
- 6.86%
- 6M
- 9.51%
- 1Y
- 29.37%
- 3Y*
- 25.85%
- 5Y*
- 12.62%
- 10Y*
- 18.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGSAX vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGSAX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.33% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGSAX vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank
FGSAX
XMMO
FGSAX vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGSAX | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.57 | 1.34 | -0.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.97 | 1.91 | -0.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.27 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | 2.41 | -1.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.04 | 11.42 | -9.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGSAX | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 | 1.34 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.60 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.83 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.55 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGSAX and XMMO is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGSAX vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison
FGSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, more than XMMO's 0.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGSAX Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund | 5.27% | 4.92% | 4.32% | 0.00% | 2.31% | 25.75% | 7.07% | 8.13% | 14.46% | 13.93% | 0.89% | 25.34% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.70% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Drawdowns
FGSAX vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGSAX drawdown since its inception was -66.17%, which is greater than XMMO's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGSAX and XMMO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGSAX | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.17% | -55.37% | -10.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.73% | -12.81% | -0.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.79% | -27.91% | -7.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.19% | -36.74% | -0.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.89% | -2.62% | -8.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.19% | -9.52% | -6.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.41% | 2.70% | +1.71% |
Volatility
FGSAX vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX) is 6.50%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 9.04%. This indicates that FGSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGSAX | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.50% | 9.04% | -2.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.19% | 14.39% | -0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.64% | 22.03% | -1.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.43% | 21.27% | +1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.32% | 22.11% | +0.21% |