PortfoliosLab logo
FGSAX vs. XMMO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FGSAX and XMMO is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

FGSAX vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FGSAX:

0.97

XMMO:

0.32

Sortino Ratio

FGSAX:

1.38

XMMO:

0.54

Omega Ratio

FGSAX:

1.20

XMMO:

1.07

Calmar Ratio

FGSAX:

0.91

XMMO:

0.26

Martin Ratio

FGSAX:

3.10

XMMO:

0.76

Ulcer Index

FGSAX:

7.28%

XMMO:

8.52%

Daily Std Dev

FGSAX:

25.19%

XMMO:

24.59%

Max Drawdown

FGSAX:

-66.17%

XMMO:

-55.37%

Current Drawdown

FGSAX:

-4.80%

XMMO:

-9.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGSAX achieves a 3.74% return, which is significantly higher than XMMO's -0.19% return. Over the past 10 years, FGSAX has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 13.06%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.07% annualized return.


FGSAX

YTD

3.74%

1M

10.15%

6M

-1.97%

1Y

22.95%

3Y*

22.12%

5Y*

17.74%

10Y*

13.06%

XMMO

YTD

-0.19%

1M

7.90%

6M

-8.12%

1Y

6.29%

3Y*

18.05%

5Y*

17.32%

10Y*

15.07%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF

FGSAX vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGSAX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.33% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FGSAX vs. XMMO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGSAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FGSAX is 8080
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FGSAX is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FGSAX is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FGSAX is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FGSAX is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FGSAX is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

XMMO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XMMO is 3737
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XMMO is 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XMMO is 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XMMO is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XMMO is 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XMMO is 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FGSAX vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FGSAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is higher than the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGSAX and XMMO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FGSAX vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

FGSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than XMMO's 0.50% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FGSAX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund
4.16%4.32%0.00%2.31%25.75%7.07%8.13%14.46%13.93%0.89%25.34%15.41%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.50%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%1.24%

Drawdowns

FGSAX vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGSAX drawdown since its inception was -66.17%, which is greater than XMMO's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGSAX and XMMO.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FGSAX vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX) has a higher volatility of 6.28% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) at 4.96%. This indicates that FGSAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...