FGSAX vs. MVCAX
FGSAX (Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund) and MVCAX (MFS Mid Cap Value Fund) are both mutual funds - FGSAX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Federated, while MVCAX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund managed by MFS. Over the past 10 years, FGSAX returned 14.50%/yr vs 10.14%/yr for MVCAX. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FGSAX charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for MVCAX.
Performance
FGSAX vs. MVCAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGSAX achieves a -0.82% return, which is significantly lower than MVCAX's 15.06% return. Over the past 10 years, FGSAX has outperformed MVCAX with an annualized return of 14.50%, while MVCAX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.14% annualized return.
FGSAX
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- -0.82%
- 1Y
- -1.90%
- 3Y*
- 15.49%
- 5Y*
- 7.87%
- 10Y*
- 14.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.02%
MVCAX
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 10.86%
- YTD
- 15.06%
- 1Y
- 21.17%
- 3Y*
- 12.62%
- 5Y*
- 9.16%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.25%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FGSAX vs. MVCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGSAX Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund | -0.82% | 10.54% | 32.97% | 27.05% | -24.60% | 22.39% | 35.50% | 27.95% | -3.23% | 24.38% |
MVCAX MFS Mid Cap Value Fund | 15.06% | 6.09% | 13.57% | 12.51% | -8.96% | 30.43% | 4.03% | 30.57% | -11.69% | 13.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGSAX and MVCAX is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2001 | 0.83 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FGSAX and MVCAX has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGSAX vs. MVCAX — Risk / Return Rank
FGSAX
MVCAX
FGSAX vs. MVCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX) and MFS Mid Cap Value Fund (MVCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FGSAX | MVCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.26 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | 2.05 | -2.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.25 | 7.09 | -7.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FGSAX vs. MVCAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGSAX drawdown since its inception was -66.17%, which is greater than MVCAX's maximum drawdown of -60.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGSAX and MVCAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGSAX | MVCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.17% | -60.41% | -5.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.73% | -9.39% | -4.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.51% | -21.05% | -3.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.79% | -21.05% | -14.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.19% | -42.79% | +5.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.42% | -1.37% | -4.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.10% | -8.08% | -8.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.33% | 2.72% | +2.61% |
Volatility
FGSAX vs. MVCAX - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to MFS Mid Cap Value Fund (MVCAX) at 3.37%. This indicates that FGSAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGSAX | MVCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | 3.37% | +1.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.47% | 9.73% | +3.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.81% | 13.45% | +4.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.54% | 17.15% | +5.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.29% | 19.18% | +3.11% |
FGSAX vs. MVCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGSAX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than MVCAX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGSAX vs. MVCAX - Dividend Comparison
FGSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, less than MVCAX's 7.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGSAX Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund | 4.96% | 4.92% | 4.32% | 0.00% | 2.31% | 25.75% | 7.07% | 8.13% | 14.46% | 13.93% | 0.89% | 25.34% |
MVCAX MFS Mid Cap Value Fund | 7.13% | 8.21% | 10.99% | 2.73% | 5.22% | 5.70% | 0.80% | 2.03% | 6.36% | 3.36% | 0.07% | 4.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FGSAX and MVCAX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FGSAX has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to MVCAX (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGSAX dropped -66.17% vs MVCAX's -60.41%.
MVCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FGSAX and MVCAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer