PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIDU vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIDU vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIDU achieves a 15.23% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 4.93% return. Over the past 10 years, FIDU has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 13.82%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.26% annualized return.


FIDU

1D
-0.96%
1M
-3.09%
6M
5.72%
YTD
15.23%
1Y
19.87%
3Y*
19.13%
5Y*
13.16%
10Y*
13.82%
ALL TIME*
12.61%

SCHG

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.84%
6M
5.77%
YTD
4.93%
1Y
15.31%
3Y*
21.96%
5Y*
13.32%
10Y*
18.26%
ALL TIME*
16.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIDU vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIDU
Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF
15.23%18.61%16.51%22.62%-8.36%20.96%13.72%30.69%-13.85%22.22%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
4.93%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FIDU and SCHG is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.71

The correlation between FIDU and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FIDU vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FIDU
SCHG

Industrials

92.9%
7.6%

Technology

5.7%
44.0%

Consumer Cyclical

0.9%
11.2%

Energy

0.4%
0.9%

Basic Materials

0.2%
1.6%

Financial Services

0.2%
7.7%

Utilities

0.1%
0.5%

Real Estate

0.0%
0.6%

Healthcare

0.0%
9.9%

Communication Services

0.0%
14.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.9%

Industrials

FIDU
92.9%
SCHG
7.6%

Technology

FIDU
5.7%
SCHG
44.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FIDU
0.9%
SCHG
11.2%

Energy

FIDU
0.4%
SCHG
0.9%

Basic Materials

FIDU
0.2%
SCHG
1.6%

Financial Services

FIDU
0.2%
SCHG
7.7%

Utilities

FIDU
0.1%
SCHG
0.5%

Real Estate

FIDU
0.0%
SCHG
0.6%

Healthcare

FIDU
0.0%
SCHG
9.9%

Communication Services

FIDU
0.0%
SCHG
14.1%

Consumer Defensive

FIDU

-

SCHG
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIDU vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIDU
FIDU Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FIDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIDU Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FIDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIDU Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIDU vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIDUSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.17

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

0.94

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.51

3.00

+3.51

FIDU vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIDU Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIDU and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIDU vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIDU drawdown since its inception was -42.31%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDU and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIDUSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.31%

-34.59%

-7.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.23%

-16.41%

+4.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.52%

-23.39%

+2.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.87%

-34.59%

+11.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.31%

-34.59%

-7.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.08%

-3.16%

-1.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.78%

-5.19%

+0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

5.12%

-2.06%

Volatility

FIDU vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 4.47%. This indicates that FIDU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIDUSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

4.47%

+0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.45%

12.82%

+1.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.79%

16.43%

+1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.40%

22.40%

-4.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.34%

21.57%

-1.23%

FIDU vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIDU has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FIDU vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

FIDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than SCHG's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIDU
Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF
0.95%1.02%1.42%1.42%1.48%1.12%1.28%1.73%1.99%1.60%1.63%1.98%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.39%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIDU and SCHG have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIDU has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to SCHG (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIDU dropped -42.31% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.26% vs 13.82% for FIDU. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.26% return vs 13.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for FIDU.

FIDU has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.39% for SCHG.

FIDU is categorized as Industrials Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. FIDU tracks MSCI USA IMI Industrials Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FIDU and 0.04% for SCHG.

FIDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIDU and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer