PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIDU vs. ONEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIDU vs. ONEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIDU achieves a 16.05% return, which is significantly higher than ONEQ's 10.15% return. Over the past 10 years, FIDU has underperformed ONEQ with an annualized return of 14.03%, while ONEQ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.56% annualized return.


FIDU

1D
0.83%
1M
-3.08%
6M
7.73%
YTD
16.05%
1Y
21.56%
3Y*
18.89%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*
14.03%
ALL TIME*
12.64%

ONEQ

1D
1.24%
1M
-1.60%
6M
9.04%
YTD
10.15%
1Y
24.38%
3Y*
22.19%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
18.56%
ALL TIME*
13.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.05M$8.74M$9.96M
$31.37M$30.53M$39.00M

FIDU vs. ONEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIDU
Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF
16.05%18.61%16.51%22.62%-8.36%20.96%13.72%30.69%-13.85%22.22%
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
10.15%20.89%29.30%45.73%-32.12%22.11%44.87%38.01%-3.18%29.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FIDU and ONEQ is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.70

The correlation between FIDU and ONEQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FIDU vs. ONEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FIDU
ONEQ

Industrials

86.2%
5.7%

Technology

5.8%
53.3%

Utilities

3.8%
0.8%

Basic Materials

1.6%
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

0.5%
11.9%

Financial Services

0.2%
2.8%

Real Estate

0.0%
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
4.3%

Healthcare

0.0%
5.1%

Communication Services

0.0%
14.3%

Energy

0.0%
0.5%

Industrials

FIDU
86.2%
ONEQ
5.7%

Technology

FIDU
5.8%
ONEQ
53.3%

Utilities

FIDU
3.8%
ONEQ
0.8%

Basic Materials

FIDU
1.6%
ONEQ
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FIDU
0.5%
ONEQ
11.9%

Financial Services

FIDU
0.2%
ONEQ
2.8%

Real Estate

FIDU
0.0%
ONEQ
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

FIDU
0.0%
ONEQ
4.3%

Healthcare

FIDU
0.0%
ONEQ
5.1%

Communication Services

FIDU
0.0%
ONEQ
14.3%

Energy

FIDU
0.0%
ONEQ
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIDU vs. ONEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIDU
FIDU Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FIDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIDU Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FIDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIDU Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

ONEQ
ONEQ Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
ONEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIDU vs. ONEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIDUONEQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.21

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

1.70

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.39

5.69

+0.69

FIDU vs. ONEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIDU Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the ONEQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIDU and ONEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIDU vs. ONEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIDU drawdown since its inception was -42.31%, smaller than the maximum ONEQ drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDU and ONEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIDUONEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.31%

-55.09%

+12.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.23%

-12.64%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.52%

-24.09%

+3.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.87%

-35.23%

+12.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.31%

-35.23%

-7.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.41%

-5.98%

+1.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.77%

-7.93%

+3.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

3.77%

-0.68%

Volatility

FIDU vs. ONEQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) is 5.09%, while Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) has a volatility of 5.72%. This indicates that FIDU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIDUONEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.09%

5.72%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.73%

14.57%

+0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.03%

18.30%

-0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.47%

22.47%

-4.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.37%

21.82%

-1.45%

FIDU vs. ONEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIDU has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than ONEQ's 0.21% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FIDU vs. ONEQ - Dividend Comparison

FIDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than ONEQ's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIDU
Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF
0.95%1.02%1.42%1.42%1.48%1.12%1.28%1.73%1.99%1.60%1.63%1.98%
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
0.88%0.54%0.65%0.71%0.97%0.54%0.71%2.51%1.08%0.84%1.12%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIDU and ONEQ have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ONEQ has higher volatility (5.72%) compared to FIDU (5.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIDU dropped -42.31% vs ONEQ's -55.09%.

On 10-year performance, ONEQ leads with 18.56% vs 14.03% for FIDU. On fees, FIDU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FIDU has been the lower-risk option at 5.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ONEQ has performed better with a 18.56% return vs 14.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FIDU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for ONEQ.

FIDU has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.88% for ONEQ.

FIDU is categorized as Industrials Equities, while ONEQ is Large Cap Growth Equities. FIDU tracks MSCI USA IMI Industrials Index, while ONEQ tracks Nasdaq Composite Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FIDU and 0.21% for ONEQ.

ONEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIDU and ONEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer