FIDU vs. IGF

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FIDU (Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF) and IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FIDU is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Industrials Index, while IGF is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FIDU returned 14.03%/yr vs 8.14%/yr for IGF. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FIDU charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGF.

Performance

FIDU vs. IGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIDU achieves a 16.05% return, which is significantly higher than IGF's 10.41% return. Over the past 10 years, FIDU has outperformed IGF with an annualized return of 14.03%, while IGF has yielded a comparatively lower 8.14% annualized return.

FIDU

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: -3.08%
• 6M: 7.73%
• YTD: 16.05%
• 1Y: 21.56%
• 3Y*: 18.89%
• 5Y*: 13.30%
• 10Y*: 14.03%
• ALL TIME*: 12.64%

IGF

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -0.09%
• 6M: 5.19%
• YTD: 10.41%
• 1Y: 16.30%
• 3Y*: 16.16%
• 5Y*: 11.05%
• 10Y*: 8.14%
• ALL TIME*: 4.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FIDU Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF	$8.05M	$8.74M	$9.96M
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	$38.15M	$37.64M	$47.97M

FIDU vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FIDU Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF	16.05%	18.61%	16.51%	22.62%	-8.36%	20.96%	13.72%	30.69%	-13.85%	22.22%
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	10.41%	21.31%	14.81%	6.14%	-1.26%	11.57%	-6.50%	25.82%	-9.95%	19.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FIDU and IGF is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.64
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013	0.64

The correlation between FIDU and IGF shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FIDU vs. IGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FIDU	IGF
Industrials	86.2%	36.4%
Technology	5.8%	-
Utilities	3.8%	40.0%
Basic Materials	1.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.5%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	-
Real Estate	0.0%	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	-
Healthcare	0.0%	-
Communication Services	0.0%	-
Energy	0.0%	20.5%

Return for Risk

FIDU vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIDU

FIDU Risk / Return Rank: 46
FIDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
FIDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
FIDU Omega Ratio Rank: 41
FIDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
FIDU Martin Ratio Rank: 55

IGF

IGF Risk / Return Rank: 69
IGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
IGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
IGF Omega Ratio Rank: 66
IGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
IGF Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIDU vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIDU	IGF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	1.55	-0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.60	2.25	-0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.28	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.61	2.83	-1.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.39	7.59	-1.20

FIDU vs. IGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIDU Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the IGF Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIDU and IGF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FIDU vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIDU drawdown since its inception was -42.31%, smaller than the maximum IGF drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDU and IGF.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIDU	IGF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.31%	-58.33%	+16.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.23%	-5.87%	-6.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.52%	-11.31%	-9.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.87%	-20.83%	-2.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.31%	-42.11%	-0.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.41%	-2.34%	-2.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.77%	-11.79%	+7.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.09%	2.19%	+0.90%

Volatility

FIDU vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) has a higher volatility of 5.09% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) at 2.75%. This indicates that FIDU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIDU	IGF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.09%	2.75%	+2.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.73%	8.92%	+5.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.03%	10.69%	+7.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.47%	13.95%	+4.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.37%	16.71%	+3.66%

FIDU vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIDU has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIDU vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison

FIDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than IGF's 2.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIDU Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF	0.95%	1.02%	1.42%	1.42%	1.48%	1.12%	1.28%	1.73%	1.99%	1.60%	1.63%	1.98%
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	2.89%	3.23%	3.21%	3.36%	2.67%	2.42%	2.33%	3.27%	3.52%	2.95%	2.98%	3.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIDU and IGF in my portfolio?

FIDU and IGF have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIDU or IGF?

FIDU has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to IGF (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIDU dropped -42.31% vs IGF's -58.33%.

Which ETF is better, FIDU or IGF?

On 10-year performance, FIDU leads with 14.03% vs 8.14% for IGF. On fees, FIDU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, IGF has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FIDU or IGF?

Over the 10-year period, FIDU has performed better with a 14.03% return vs 8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FIDU or IGF?

FIDU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FIDU or IGF?

IGF has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 0.95% for FIDU.

What is the main difference between FIDU and IGF?

FIDU is categorized as Industrials Equities, while IGF is Infrastructure Equities. FIDU tracks MSCI USA IMI Industrials Index, while IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FIDU and 0.39% for IGF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IGF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.