FIDGX vs. EMCAX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FIDGX (Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class Z) and EMCAX (Empiric 2500 Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FIDGX returned 8.18%/yr vs 4.38%/yr for EMCAX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FIDGX charges 0.90%/yr vs 1.96%/yr for EMCAX.

Performance

FIDGX vs. EMCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class Z (FIDGX) and Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIDGX achieves a 18.00% return, which is significantly higher than EMCAX's 12.65% return.

FIDGX

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 1.36%
• YTD: 18.00%
• 6M: 14.60%
• 1Y: 37.29%
• 3Y*: 20.73%
• 5Y*: 8.18%
• 10Y*: —

EMCAX

• 1D: 1.46%
• 1M: -0.32%
• YTD: 12.65%
• 6M: 9.02%
• 1Y: 18.41%
• 3Y*: 13.11%
• 5Y*: 4.38%
• 10Y*: 10.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIDGX vs. EMCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FIDGX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class Z	18.00%	11.29%	20.67%	19.17%	-25.25%	10.63%	36.52%	36.54%	-4.45%	22.27%
EMCAX Empiric 2500 Fund	12.65%	2.37%	13.89%	12.43%	-16.06%	16.07%	27.81%	19.10%	-4.64%	19.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FIDGX and EMCAX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2017	0.91

The correlation between FIDGX and EMCAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FIDGX vs. EMCAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIDGX

FIDGX Risk / Return Rank: 45
FIDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FIDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
FIDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
FIDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
FIDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

EMCAX

EMCAX Risk / Return Rank: 26
EMCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
EMCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
EMCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
EMCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
EMCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIDGX vs. EMCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class Z (FIDGX) and Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FIDGX	EMCAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	1.27	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	1.94	+0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.22	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	2.10	+0.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.55	7.92	+3.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FIDGX vs. EMCAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIDGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the EMCAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIDGX and EMCAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIDGX	EMCAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.78	1.27	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	0.24	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.46	+0.14

Drawdowns

FIDGX vs. EMCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIDGX drawdown since its inception was -38.99%, smaller than the maximum EMCAX drawdown of -51.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDGX and EMCAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIDGX	EMCAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.99%	-51.81%	+12.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.09%	-8.60%	-4.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.68%	-19.19%	-9.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.99%	-30.60%	-8.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.90%	-1.15%	+0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.78%	-13.27%	+2.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.25%	2.28%	+0.97%

Volatility

FIDGX vs. EMCAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class Z (FIDGX) has a higher volatility of 6.51% compared to Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX) at 4.84%. This indicates that FIDGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIDGX	EMCAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.51%	4.84%	+1.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.21%	11.30%	+4.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.20%	14.22%	+6.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.48%	18.18%	+5.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.33%	20.24%	+3.09%

FIDGX vs. EMCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIDGX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than EMCAX's 1.96% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIDGX vs. EMCAX - Dividend Comparison

FIDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.34%, more than EMCAX's 0.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EMCAX Empiric 2500 Fund	0.12%	0.13%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.51%	7.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FIDGX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class Z	5.34%	6.31%	1.49%	0.00%	0.00%	19.26%	8.17%	5.27%	14.38%	6.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIDGX and EMCAX in my portfolio?

FIDGX and EMCAX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIDGX or EMCAX?

FIDGX has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to EMCAX (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIDGX dropped -38.99% vs EMCAX's -51.81%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FIDGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.