PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIDGX vs. ANOIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIDGX vs. ANOIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class Z (FIDGX) and American Century Small Cap Growth Fund (ANOIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIDGX achieves a 25.29% return, which is significantly higher than ANOIX's 17.86% return.


FIDGX

1D
1.21%
1M
7.49%
YTD
25.29%
6M
21.58%
1Y
45.01%
3Y*
22.97%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*

ANOIX

1D
1.19%
1M
7.70%
YTD
17.86%
6M
14.80%
1Y
27.99%
3Y*
16.70%
5Y*
5.20%
10Y*
14.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIDGX vs. ANOIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIDGX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class Z
25.29%11.29%20.67%19.17%-25.25%10.63%36.52%36.54%-4.45%22.27%
ANOIX
American Century Small Cap Growth Fund
17.86%9.00%14.90%17.13%-26.41%7.80%51.07%36.75%-4.84%22.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FIDGX and ANOIX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2017

0.97

The correlation between FIDGX and ANOIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIDGX vs. ANOIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIDGX
FIDGX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FIDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FIDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

ANOIX
ANOIX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
ANOIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANOIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANOIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
ANOIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANOIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIDGX vs. ANOIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class Z (FIDGX) and American Century Small Cap Growth Fund (ANOIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIDGXANOIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.25

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

2.36

+1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.08

8.83

+5.26

FIDGX vs. ANOIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIDGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the ANOIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIDGX and ANOIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIDGX vs. ANOIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIDGX drawdown since its inception was -38.99%, smaller than the maximum ANOIX drawdown of -59.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDGX and ANOIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIDGXANOIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.99%

-59.47%

+20.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.09%

-12.49%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.68%

-25.57%

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.99%

-37.15%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.73%

-11.97%

+1.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

3.33%

-0.06%

Volatility

FIDGX vs. ANOIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class Z (FIDGX) has a higher volatility of 7.83% compared to American Century Small Cap Growth Fund (ANOIX) at 6.99%. This indicates that FIDGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANOIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIDGXANOIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.83%

6.99%

+0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.33%

15.95%

+1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.26%

20.71%

+1.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.68%

23.08%

+0.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.39%

23.37%

+0.02%

FIDGX vs. ANOIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIDGX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than ANOIX's 1.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIDGX vs. ANOIX - Dividend Comparison

FIDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, less than ANOIX's 6.45% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ANOIX
American Century Small Cap Growth Fund
6.45%7.60%0.11%0.00%0.00%21.29%11.07%5.50%16.59%3.93%
FIDGX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class Z
5.03%6.31%1.49%0.00%0.00%19.26%8.17%5.27%14.38%6.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FIDGX and ANOIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIDGX has higher volatility (7.83%) compared to ANOIX (6.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIDGX dropped -38.99% vs ANOIX's -59.47%.

FIDGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIDGX and ANOIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer