PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIDGX vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIDGX vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class Z (FIDGX) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIDGX achieves a 25.29% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's 23.32% return.


FIDGX

1D
1.21%
1M
7.49%
YTD
25.29%
6M
21.58%
1Y
45.01%
3Y*
22.97%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*

VGT

1D
-3.68%
1M
0.28%
YTD
23.32%
6M
21.50%
1Y
46.82%
3Y*
30.13%
5Y*
19.51%
10Y*
25.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIDGX vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIDGX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class Z
25.29%11.29%20.67%19.17%-25.25%10.63%36.52%36.54%-4.45%22.27%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
23.32%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%28.53%

Correlation

The correlation between FIDGX and VGT is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2017

0.79

The correlation between FIDGX and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

FIDGX vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FIDGX
VGT

Healthcare

29.0%
0.0%

Industrials

24.5%
0.4%

Technology

20.8%
98.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
0.1%

Financial Services

6.2%
0.5%

Energy

3.1%
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%

-

Basic Materials

2.6%
0.0%

Communication Services

1.0%
0.5%

Real Estate

0.9%

-

Utilities

0.5%

-

Healthcare

FIDGX
29.0%
VGT
0.0%

Industrials

FIDGX
24.5%
VGT
0.4%

Technology

FIDGX
20.8%
VGT
98.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FIDGX
8.3%
VGT
0.1%

Financial Services

FIDGX
6.2%
VGT
0.5%

Energy

FIDGX
3.1%
VGT
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

FIDGX
3.0%
VGT

-

Basic Materials

FIDGX
2.6%
VGT
0.0%

Communication Services

FIDGX
1.0%
VGT
0.5%

Real Estate

FIDGX
0.9%
VGT

-

Utilities

FIDGX
0.5%
VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIDGX vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIDGX
FIDGX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FIDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FIDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIDGX vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class Z (FIDGX) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIDGXVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.35

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

2.87

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.08

8.76

+5.32

FIDGX vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIDGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIDGX and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIDGX vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIDGX drawdown since its inception was -38.99%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDGX and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIDGXVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.99%

-54.63%

+15.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.09%

-16.40%

+3.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.68%

-27.23%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.99%

-35.07%

-3.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.71%

+7.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.73%

-7.95%

-2.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

5.36%

-2.09%

Volatility

FIDGX vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class Z (FIDGX) is 7.83%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 11.39%. This indicates that FIDGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIDGXVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.83%

11.39%

-3.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.33%

18.58%

-1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.26%

22.72%

-0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.68%

25.55%

-1.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.39%

24.77%

-1.38%

FIDGX vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIDGX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIDGX vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

FIDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, more than VGT's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIDGX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class Z
5.03%6.31%1.49%0.00%0.00%19.26%8.17%5.27%14.38%6.92%0.00%0.00%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.33%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIDGX and VGT have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (11.39%) compared to FIDGX (7.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIDGX dropped -38.99% vs VGT's -54.63%.

FIDGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIDGX and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer