FIDAX vs. FLC
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Financial Industries Fund (FIDAX) and Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC).
FIDAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Mar 14, 1996. FLC is an actively managed fund by Flaherty & Crumrine. It was launched on Aug 29, 2003.
Performance
FIDAX vs. FLC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIDAX vs. FLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIDAX John Hancock Financial Industries Fund | -7.63% | 12.05% | 30.09% | 5.01% | -14.17% | 28.80% | 1.58% | 31.21% | -15.30% | 11.00% |
FLC Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc | -2.38% | 12.38% | 23.05% | -0.83% | -25.11% | 2.82% | 14.12% | 38.65% | -14.14% | 17.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIDAX achieves a -7.63% return, which is significantly lower than FLC's -2.38% return. Over the past 10 years, FIDAX has outperformed FLC with an annualized return of 9.71%, while FLC has yielded a comparatively lower 5.44% annualized return.
FIDAX
- 1D
- 2.52%
- 1M
- -3.75%
- YTD
- -7.63%
- 6M
- -1.62%
- 1Y
- 3.84%
- 3Y*
- 15.65%
- 5Y*
- 6.21%
- 10Y*
- 9.71%
FLC
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -4.71%
- YTD
- -2.38%
- 6M
- -2.35%
- 1Y
- 7.40%
- 3Y*
- 12.19%
- 5Y*
- -0.41%
- 10Y*
- 5.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIDAX vs. FLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIDAX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is lower than FLC's 1.64% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FIDAX vs. FLC — Risk / Return Rank
FIDAX
FLC
FIDAX vs. FLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Financial Industries Fund (FIDAX) and Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIDAX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.18 | 0.65 | -0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.38 | 0.87 | -0.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.16 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 0.85 | -0.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.95 | 3.23 | -2.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIDAX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 | 0.65 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | -0.03 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.25 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.28 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIDAX and FLC is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FIDAX vs. FLC - Dividend Comparison
FIDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 52.17%, more than FLC's 7.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIDAX John Hancock Financial Industries Fund | 52.17% | 48.19% | 10.24% | 1.91% | 11.22% | 23.08% | 5.41% | 7.56% | 7.72% | 6.10% | 6.01% | 0.93% |
FLC Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc | 7.28% | 6.81% | 6.62% | 7.38% | 8.95% | 6.86% | 6.27% | 6.31% | 8.34% | 7.22% | 8.20% | 8.51% |
Drawdowns
FIDAX vs. FLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIDAX drawdown since its inception was -70.42%, smaller than the maximum FLC drawdown of -76.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDAX and FLC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIDAX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.42% | -76.79% | +6.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.82% | -8.69% | -5.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.89% | -40.14% | +9.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.09% | -55.27% | +13.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.77% | -5.76% | -5.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.12% | -10.92% | -3.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.94% | 2.29% | +2.65% |
Volatility
FIDAX vs. FLC - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Financial Industries Fund (FIDAX) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC) at 4.46%. This indicates that FIDAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIDAX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 4.46% | +0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.07% | 5.88% | +7.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.69% | 11.39% | +9.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 14.24% | +6.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.01% | 22.05% | -0.04% |