FIDAX vs. FIKBX
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Financial Industries Fund (FIDAX) and Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z (FIKBX).
FIDAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Mar 14, 1996. FIKBX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018.
Performance
FIDAX vs. FIKBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIDAX vs. FIKBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIDAX John Hancock Financial Industries Fund | -7.63% | 12.05% | 30.09% | 5.01% | -14.17% | 28.80% | 1.58% | 31.21% | -13.92% |
FIKBX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z | -7.25% | 15.36% | 32.80% | 14.47% | -8.58% | 33.43% | 0.18% | 34.31% | -11.43% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FIDAX having a -7.63% return and FIKBX slightly higher at -7.25%.
FIDAX
- 1D
- 2.52%
- 1M
- -3.75%
- YTD
- -7.63%
- 6M
- -1.62%
- 1Y
- 3.84%
- 3Y*
- 15.65%
- 5Y*
- 6.21%
- 10Y*
- 9.71%
FIKBX
- 1D
- 2.32%
- 1M
- -3.90%
- YTD
- -7.25%
- 6M
- -2.46%
- 1Y
- 7.21%
- 3Y*
- 19.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.62%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIDAX vs. FIKBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIDAX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKBX's 0.64% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FIDAX vs. FIKBX — Risk / Return Rank
FIDAX
FIKBX
FIDAX vs. FIKBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Financial Industries Fund (FIDAX) and Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z (FIKBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIDAX | FIKBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.18 | 0.34 | -0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.38 | 0.60 | -0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.09 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 0.57 | -0.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.95 | 1.76 | -0.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIDAX | FIKBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 | 0.34 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.51 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.47 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIDAX and FIKBX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FIDAX vs. FIKBX - Dividend Comparison
FIDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 52.17%, more than FIKBX's 7.67% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIDAX John Hancock Financial Industries Fund | 52.17% | 48.19% | 10.24% | 1.91% | 11.22% | 23.08% | 5.41% | 7.56% | 7.72% | 6.10% | 6.01% | 0.93% |
FIKBX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z | 7.67% | 7.11% | 5.04% | 2.48% | 6.20% | 4.43% | 2.78% | 1.59% | 4.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FIDAX vs. FIKBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIDAX drawdown since its inception was -70.42%, which is greater than FIKBX's maximum drawdown of -45.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDAX and FIKBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIDAX | FIKBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.42% | -45.95% | -24.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.82% | -14.41% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.89% | -24.82% | -6.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.77% | -10.05% | -0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.12% | -8.17% | -5.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.94% | 4.65% | +0.29% |
Volatility
FIDAX vs. FIKBX - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Financial Industries Fund (FIDAX) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z (FIKBX) at 5.10%. This indicates that FIDAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIKBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIDAX | FIKBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 5.10% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.07% | 12.65% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.69% | 21.23% | -0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 20.81% | -0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.01% | 26.15% | -4.14% |