FID vs. GRID
FID (First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and GRID (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FID is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index, while GRID is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FID returned 7.59%/yr vs 16.63%/yr for GRID. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FID charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for GRID.
Performance
FID vs. GRID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FID achieves a 5.57% return, which is significantly lower than GRID's 23.40% return.
FID
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -2.23%
- YTD
- 5.57%
- 6M
- 5.46%
- 1Y
- 18.04%
- 3Y*
- 17.19%
- 5Y*
- 7.59%
- 10Y*
- —
GRID
- 1D
- -4.46%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- YTD
- 23.40%
- 6M
- 22.11%
- 1Y
- 42.41%
- 3Y*
- 24.21%
- 5Y*
- 16.63%
- 10Y*
- 19.95%
FID vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 5.57% | 32.07% | 5.42% | 9.92% | -9.69% | 12.90% | -7.56% | 20.82% | -7.38% |
GRID First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund | 23.40% | 29.65% | 15.18% | 21.57% | -13.89% | 27.65% | 48.84% | 42.80% | -22.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between FID and GRID is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2018 | 0.64 |
The correlation between FID and GRID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
FID vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FID
GRID
Financial Services
-
Utilities
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
FID
GRID
-
Utilities
FID
GRID
Industrials
FID
GRID
Communication Services
FID
GRID
-
Real Estate
FID
GRID
-
Energy
FID
GRID
Technology
FID
GRID
Basic Materials
FID
GRID
Consumer Cyclical
FID
GRID
Consumer Defensive
FID
GRID
-
Healthcare
FID
GRID
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FID vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank
FID
GRID
FID vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FID | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.35 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 3.63 | -1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.97 | 12.92 | -5.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FID vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FID drawdown since its inception was -39.79%, roughly equal to the maximum GRID drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FID and GRID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FID | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.79% | -40.56% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -11.73% | +2.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.97% | -20.77% | +9.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.13% | -29.64% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.84% | -5.55% | +1.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.43% | -8.42% | -0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 3.29% | -0.70% |
Volatility
FID vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) is 3.41%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a volatility of 10.12%. This indicates that FID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FID | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.41% | 10.12% | -6.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.58% | 18.23% | -9.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.33% | 21.26% | -10.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 21.37% | -4.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.92% | 22.80% | -3.88% |
FID vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison
FID has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
FID vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison
FID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, more than GRID's 0.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 4.14% | 4.30% | 4.31% | 4.19% | 4.22% | 3.76% | 3.91% | 3.70% | 1.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GRID First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund | 0.80% | 1.01% | 1.06% | 1.23% | 1.26% | 0.63% | 0.68% | 1.26% | 1.28% | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FID and GRID have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRID has higher volatility (10.12%) compared to FID (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FID dropped -39.79% vs GRID's -40.56%.
On 5-year performance, GRID leads with 16.63% vs 7.59% for FID. On fees, FID is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FID has been the lower-risk option at 3.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GRID has performed better with a 16.63% return vs 7.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FID is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.
FID has the higher dividend yield at 4.14%, compared with 0.80% for GRID.
FID is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. FID tracks S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index, while GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FID and 0.70% for GRID.
GRID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FID and GRID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer